Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that from ancient times, where the ancestors of human started to associate with their peers from the moment of their birth and gossips had a wide popularity, up until today’s modern life, information, how to obtain the information, the integrity of information and other issues around the information have been the most controversial topics. Although many parochial people would pretend that getting information from several sources is wasting time, I thoroughly believe that everyone should refer to the diverse origins to acquire his information that he/ she needs. The reasons to substantiate my perspective will be illustrated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, to be convinced with the accuracy of the gained news, it is essential to have accessibility to the information that belongs to varied resources. Otherwise, you may jump to conclusions by reading exclusively one biased news that could result in confusion. Actually, that is impossible for many contemporary news agencies to act as an impartial media and it can be traced back to the clue that they supposed to be programmed to diffuse the news by a purposeful orientation because of various motivations. Maybe that is the question of money and if they scatter the news objectively, in contrast to the considered Orwellian procedures, they will lose their governmental or private sponsors; as a result, they cannot afford their expenses and that is what they are usually stigmatized for. Furthermore, the patriotism sentimental of their employees may hinder them to disperse some information honestly and consequently, they may operate selectively in this way. For instance, when it comes to political news, I would rather watch multiple TV channels like BBC, CNN and PRESS TV, that are from different countries, to access the quality of the distributed news and validate its precision. Not until anybody sees several TV channels could he absolutely verify the obtained news. To put in a nutshell, the more the roots of news, the more perfect the news acquisition.
Second, the diversification of the contents, made many people collect their daily required news from the distinguished news agencies. In fact, with respect to their investment or prowess in different fields, each news agency is more erudite in a particular issue, which made a name for it. In other words, now that they pay more attention to their heterogeneous hierarchical policies, they will have more expertise in a distinctive issue; hence their operational mode will be more dynamic in the few finite areas. Scarcely would people be able to be conscious of the dissimilar areas of news that they need for their daily requirements unless they pursue immense news agencies. In addition, the news channels to which we listened every day, have different facilities, budget and also different administrators by varied idiosyncrasies that they inevitably are inclined to discrete routes. Regarding equipment, science, military, astrology and wild nature are known as the most sophisticated topics. Not only do these issues necessitate enjoying sufficient fund but they also require a determined tendency that may not be accessible for every news agencies. I myself, for example, whenever I want to be aware what is happening around me in this world, I will watch merely listen to the CNN or BBC which are the most integral media in the political news scope thanks to their best political reporters, their comprehensive interpretations and their certified experts. Besides, if you want to access the authentic scientific news, you had better read IEEE magazine due to its precise data analysis and its ingenious researchers. Seldom can you find a better sports website than Goal, correspondingly, considering its industrious reporters that were professional athletes one day. Cutting a long story short, everybody had better infer to various news fountains to supply his/ her demand.
In conclusion, taking everything into account, nobody should take it for granted by considering just a news source, else that would lead to a misunderstanding due to the prejudice, divided approach, and the budget and equipment diversity of news agencies. By and large, I forcefully subscribe to the view that anybody must acquire the news from multiple origins due to point that neither validity and nor universal coverage of all vital topics is feasible unless we do not utilize numerous sources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, honestly, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, by and large, in contrast to, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 79.0 43.0788530466 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3757.0 1977.66487455 190% => OK
No of words: 708.0 407.700716846 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30649717514 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15832040409 4.48103885553 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02383251397 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 380.0 212.727598566 179% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 1179.0 618.680645161 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0382201126 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.541666667 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.45110844103 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192468991471 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603871979688 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356204782807 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12279730684 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269797329017 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 204.0 86.8835125448 235% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.