It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation
“Public transportation plays a staple role in our daily life.” Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Which is one important: improving internet access or public transportation? As far as I am concerned, public transportation plays a major role in reducing pollutants, has great impacts globally, and helps people to save both their time and money. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some arguments to support the position.
First and foremost, no prize for guessing that public transportation takes a center stage in reducing air pollution. Indeed, improving public transportation can reduce traffic jams. As a result, it has a great impact on mitigating air pollutions. In fact, according to the SCI, Statistical Center of Iran, private cars have an important role in disseminating air pollutants such as carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, etc. Thus, improving public transportation can reduce the air pollutions effectively.
Another thing coming to the mind is that improving public transportation obstructs global warming’s side-effects. As an illustrated case, by using public vehicles, the emission of carbon dioxide takes a nosedive and as a result, it stops effectively global warming which puts the flora and faunas’ lives in risk. The fact of the matter is that amending public transportation can provide the opportunity for endangered animals or plants to be recovered. Therefore, this process has a great impact ecologically.
Last but not least, although some people believe that improving internet access is a peremptory action, others prefer to spend on improving public transportation. Because of this fact that the improvement can reduce pollutants as well as traffic congestion, it is beneficiary for people to help them to scrimp and save not only their time but also the money. For example, it helps people to save money pertinent to car’s fuels, taxes, and parking lots. Besides, it benefits them because it reduces various diseases’ outbreak, mentally or physically, which are derived from pollutions and noises. Hence, it seems that governments’ improving public transportation is an imperative and beneficiary approach.
In the nutshell, even though some people prefer amending internet access rather than improving public transportation, others beg to differ. Improving public transportation not only can reduce pollutants, but also it helps people to save their time and money. In addition to, it enables governments to mitigate the side-effects of global warming ecologically. If governments had improved public transportation, nowadays societies would not have encountered with such thorny issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s, the emission of carbon dioxide takes a nosedive and as a result, it stops effectively g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve encountered with such thorny issues.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, another thing, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6875 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33387068585 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5175 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2342882675 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.409090909 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41435303262 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129670550539 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109307066126 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239835280268 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717513765425 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.