It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own

Essay topics:

It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.

One pivotal factor in this modern world that leads the community is news. News and media generate and control by a wide variety of people with different views that sometimes are in line with our opinions and sometimes are against them. Due to its crucial characteristic in this hectic life, there is a long-standing discussion among people that what kind of news they should watch. Some people are inclined toward the idea that is better to follow the same viewpoints, whereas others prefer to test news that is not similar to their attitude. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I do believe that watching different views is the best option. It can improve our knowledge by learning new things. It can push us to think about other opinions and also can bring us new friends.

To commence, learning new material is a master key and a good motivation for spending time watching the news. Needless to say, watching the news from different notions dramatically increases our knowledge in all directions. Sometimes, opposite viewpoints are like a buzzer that makes us aware of our lives and teach us new science. Take for example, I always liked mathematics and I hated physics. One time I was watching the physics news, and I found out that time I have to study more in this field. In fact, I was in a situation where I had to watch that movie. I understood we must try opposite views and correct our opinion and hear other voices.
Another reason that comes to my mind is that watching this kind of news challenges our opinion and notions about other views and also opens new gates in our lives. To illustrate this point one need only refer to a scientific fact about grey cells in our brain. Scientifically speaking, the number of those cells defines the activity level of our brain. It is worth stating at this point that, a research recently conducted in my country indicates that thinking about opposite views can increase the number of those cells.
Last but not least, we can find new friends by following different viewpoints. When I watch the news in the media, try to search and find people that are active in that field. Generally speaking, new views bring new friends. Having this gained from society, people are more welcoming to watching the news from people whose views are far from theirs, because they think it can help them to make new friends. They believe that it is like a complimentary for their views and they can fill some holes in their mind by asking for help from different viewpoints.

In conclusion, although some exceptions are excluded from the general rule, I, myself, support watching the news from people with opposite views. This can help us to find new friends, push us to think deeply, and open new doors to us.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...om people with opposite views. This can help us to find new friends, push us to think deeply, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70491803279 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48472557705 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47131147541 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.65022639 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.84 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.52 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240543196634 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739772808178 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625563178136 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148151941174 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508552777241 0.0645574589148 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.