It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is ubiquitous for modern citizens to gaze at digital devices to watch news as a daily grind. When it comes to whether watching or reading news presented from same standpoint is the best, individuals’ opinions differ from person to person. While some claim that getting information from the same view allows people to gain the idea more clearly, I, on the contrary, contend that it is much better to consume news written by people whose views differ from that of readers.
To commence with, one of the most compelling reasons in advocacy of the thesis is that pupils would learn to make own perspectives more flexible. When citizens and the news reporters observe face news from the same angle, citizens struggle from making trials to see it from different perspectives. This often leads to an issue that pupils stick to one problem with only one approach. For instance, there was a debate among citizens in Japan about whether advocating students to have part time jobs is acceptable. Those who have teenage children insist to an opinion that it makes bad influences on children’s education process; whereas students claim that parents should allow them to accumulate social experiences. But when they were persuaded to consider standpoints of each other, they could think thoroughly about this topic and could become more flexible. From this case we can imply that not considering the opposing perspectives would result in enormous frictions.
In addition, reading news from different perspectives provides with opportunities for readers to learn the topic discussed deeper. In other words, it would guide the readers to see the whole picture of an issue. Take my experience for an instance. The assignment was to make researches about solutions for environment pollutions of each countries. I focused on residents’ opinions first since I can understand people’s voices which is having the same conditions with me. However, when I read articles scientists had wrote, my mind shifted. I realized that there were misunderstandings and lack of fluent communications between citizens and scientists. Therefore, I started to look at different view of this issue and could understand the issue as a whole.
Furthermore, getting engaged with different views cultivate pupils’ criticizing skills. By reading news from different view, we can easily realize that all the issues are not single-sided; actually they can draw many opinions. To illustrate this, my sister Lydia had read a news about protecting endangered animals and read many opinions regarding this. She realized that every issue is tangled by different features so that she started to search for criticisms that is germane to issues in her daily lives. Now that she can easily find many perspectives of an issue and criticize it with thorough analysis.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that a clearer understanding of news is brought by the presenters who share the same views with readers, the benefits reading news from different standpoint brings far outweighs the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...out whether advocating students to have part time jobs is acceptable. Those who have teen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...er, when I read articles scientists had wrote, my mind shifted. I realized that there...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...lustrate this, my sister Lydia had read a news about protecting endangered animals and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2693877551 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87191806454 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534693877551 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2963731481 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243149497325 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645760130787 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705075882992 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160409423526 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818985776151 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.