It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends

Essay topics:

It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends.

Without a doubt, migration to a new place may bring about some positive and negative impacts on the peoples' life. They may lose their connections with old friends while gaining some benefits. Although some may prefer to live in a constant place for their life span to stay connected to their friends, I personally prefer to experience more towns and countries during my life. I feel this way for a couple of main reasons that I will elaborate in the following essay.

To begin with, by living in new places people can gain some profits that may outweigh the things that they may lose. In fact, people who decide to leave their living place investigate the advantages and disadvantages of their migration. In particular, some people may find a great job position which increaes their income. Thus, despite the negative impacts that migration may have on their lives such as losing connections, they decide to move to the new country or city. For example, my cousin had been living in a constant place for 20 years. So, he had many close friends who used to spend the majority of his time with. He was also so emotionaly depended on his family, and could not consider living without them. But he found a great job in the United states that offered him an unbelievable salary. This opportunity was so great that he decided to move to the United states and leave all friends and family members. Now he is really succesful and it seems that he has made a correct decision.

Moreover, people are able to stay in contact with their old friends, even when they are far from them. In fact, current century is called the technology era. Indeed, with a significant increase in the widespread of the Internet, people are able to call their peers when ever they want. Therefore, they may have no serious concern about missing their friends. To take my own example, last year I was supposed to go to France for an Internship. At the beginnig I was really worried about my friends who I used to visit every day. But when I went to France I could make video-calls with them. As a result, changing my living place, did not significantly affected our relashionship.

To sum up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons, I am totaly convinced that people should not hesitate to move to other places because of their friends. This is not only because they may achieve some benfits that worth leaving friends but also because they may stay connected to their friends using the latest technological advances.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...me positive and negative impacts on the peoples life. They may lose their connections w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
... my living place, did not significantly affected our relashionship. To sum up, taking...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i feel, in fact, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73853211009 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5475240525 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8691004568 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0833333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54166666667 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323081688604 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848352685099 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729062353321 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205851966463 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391117467454 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.