Job sharing is a type of part-time employment in which one position can be shared by two part-time workers; that is, the two people share the work, hours, and pay of one job. Job sharing opens more opportunities to people who have other responsibilities, such as taking care of their children or studying, and who need flexible working hours. Do you agree or disagree that job sharing is good for workers? Why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people in the world have a job in order to get enough money for their expenditure in daily life. Personally, I agree that job sharing is an excellent idea for workers. There are several reasons why I feel this way, which I will elaborate on in the following essay.
To begin with, job-sharing can help workers improve productivity. Every job required employees to devote their physical and mental energy to finish tasks. However, their limited energy may make them feel stressed if they work for long hours everyday. As a result, their efficiency might decrease because of their lack of taking rest. Fortunately, job-sharing is an excellent idea which can deal with this problem. Sharing workloads with other people can let workers have extra time to relax sufficiently, so they will be more energetic to concentrate on work and boost their productivity when they go back to work. This type of part-time employment not only helps employees relieve their stress, but also helps companies make better profits.
Furthermore, sharing work can increase people’s living standards. To be more specific, if they have less working hours, they will have more spare time to increase their quality of life. For example, they can use their leisure time to sleep more, workout, and prepare nutritious meals, so they can keep a healthy body. Additionally, they can spend delightful time with their family and friends, such as watching an interesting movie together and connecting with each other. Doing so enables them to build intimate relationships with others and reach a better mental state. To sum up, job sharing can provide workers more free time and drastically improve their satisfaction with their life.
In conclusion, I maintain that job-sharing is an amazing idea for workers. This is because it can improve their work efficiency and let them have great living standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...el stressed if they work for long hours everyday. As a result, their efficiency might de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...relax sufficiently, so they will be more energetic to concentrate on work and boo...
^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing idea for workers. This is because it can improve their work efficiency and le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14983713355 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6810132845 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3929559364 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8333333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323817519775 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11918088796 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805854817142 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214437158702 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048637136881 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.