leadership comes naturally. One can not learn how to lead
In the last three decades, leadership has been a crucial skill that everyone need to acquire. Some people believe that leadership is an instict that everyone could be born with it; however, there is a substantial body of evidence claims that leadership could not come naturally. From a personal perspective, leadership is not an innate given that everyone could gain it through learning and practicing. Below I will strive to explain my supporting point in more detail.
The first and foremost point, everyone could learn how to be a leader. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on that is schools in developed countries, such as Canada and the US usually design learning activities to teach their students many skills, such as leaderships. To put in other words, primary students may not have this shill; one the other hand, they could gain it when they become at high school age. Consequently, everyone could learn how to lead.
Next, coupled with learning, practicing is another way to acquire leadership. For instanse, software and hardware engineers in Silicon Valley could start their practical life as a member in a team; however, by time they could enhance their skills and gian the ability to lead and attian managerial positions with higher salaries. Likewise, people in other jobs could amplify their skills, such as make schedules, check inventories and organize plans, so they could lead. Therefore, leaderships is not skill that comes naturally, but it is a skill needs many practice to be acquired.
Taking eveything into consideration; without a doubt, leadership is not an instict, but it is a skill that everyone could have it not only by learning, but also by practicing. It is suggested that schools encourage their students to gain this skills throughout design many learning activities that promote their ability to be leaders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun practice seems to be countable; consider using: 'many practices'.
Suggestion: many practices
...omes naturally, but it is a skill needs many practice to be acquired. Taking eveything int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...chools encourage their students to gain this skills throughout design many learning ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at promote their ability to be leaders.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08794788274 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71498713286 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547231270358 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4777685506 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216839824949 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875667689235 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743613470141 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127947295712 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042135071701 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.