Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage. Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty, such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage. Others said there are better ways to stop them from harming environment.
In the modern society, the environmental problems are attracting increasing attention. The environment pollution has various sources, and one of those primary streams is the pollution comes from the companies. Among a number of methods proposed to ameliorate our environment, a penalty to those companies who caused environmental damage is agreed by majority of the public. However, from my perspective, I believe this method is not enough to solve the environmental problem.
Firstly, the penalty could be insufficient compared to those company's profit. Take the example of those factory producing papers. They cut down millions of trees annually to make paper which cause the decline of habitats of wild animal and many other environmental problems. Nonetheless, the producing process of the paper involves several toxic chemical matters. Those toxic matters would be mixed into the exhausted fume and emitted into the air. However, the penalty cannot prevent them from doing so. After the payment of the penalty, they can still earn money from their product.
Moreover, there is no guarantee that the fines from those companies would be used to improve the environmental condition. There could be other usages of the fines such the fund on research, and the public welfare. As a result, the budget to ameliorate the environment could be insufficient to compensate the damage caused by those companies. In China, the environmental problem has been a serious one for years, and the government had already claimed the policy to ask those industrial company to pay extra money for their pollutant. However, the haze is still around numbers of cities including the national capital Beijing. One possible explanation is that the government received the tax, and use it to build the facilities and buildings such as the railway and the subway. Those project, in return, make the air condition worse for the soil particles mixed into the air in the process of constructing. In this sense, the penalty is not enough to make up those damage caused by those companies.
From my perspective, it could be effective to publish the law of the penalty on environmental pollution. However, it should be combined with other methods. For instance, forcing those company to set the machine which can remove the harmful matter in the exhausted fume or wastewater could be a good one to solve the damage.
Put all in the nutshell, it not sufficient to only ask penalty to those companies. However, this approach could work with other combined enforcement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this factory' or 'those factories'?
Suggestion: this factory; those factories
...se companys profit. Take the example of those factory producing papers. They cut down million...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng so. After the payment of the penalty, they can still earn money from their pro...
^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'those companies'?
Suggestion: this company; those companies
...th other methods. For instance, forcing those company to set the machine which can remove the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20681265207 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83619199951 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498783454988 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2490678481 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1666666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189866357436 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053905407218 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403237472871 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108102486545 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373650682168 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.