Museums across the world capture the attention of travellers for several reasons, but not all museums are same. They differ in the types of items showcased. Since all museums are not the same, the reasons why people choose to go to museums also vary accordingly. Despite the variation, there is one common factor among all that museums. It is that they offer a collection of items dispersed across time, space, or both in one place.
For instance, some museums maintain a collection of items from a particular past civilization. Students of history who want to understand that particular civilization will be drawn to such museums, while others might not find them as engaging. Personally, I have always found it interesting to know more about the kings that ruled the place I was born. It might feel great to read a description of a sword of a king, but it can never quite match the personal experience of watching it with own eyes. So, whenever I get a chance to visit some history museums dedicated towards capturing a particular time period, I definitely go there.
Some tourists are attracted to art museums. The art collections can vary in several forms such as they can capture the art works of a lot of artists together. They could also be dedicated to the art works of a single artist. In any case, people who are interested in those arts would like to visit such museums. In these days of computer and internet, a digital copy of a lot of art works is readily available. What these lack is the exact feel of the product because information such as material used, imperfections in the paint used in case of a painting can be experience only when visited in person.
In addition to the above examples cited, there are quite a few varied and diverse collections of items in the museums. Depending on a person's taste, they choose to visit museums of preference.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72256097561 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68501685499 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4967865996 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0555555556 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207491857619 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628654479908 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651815801209 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127816936517 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048204253736 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.