The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity.
Today, with an increase in economical issues a great part of the society are dealing with hard life conditions. Although some may believe it is the government's responsibilty to tackle these issues, I think in addition to the government , it is the responsibility of rich people to decrease the pressure on poor people, for the following reasons.
First and foremost, by helping charities, the wealthy people do their social responsibility, which leads to a sense of internal satisfaction for them. Furthermore, a rich person in addition to his personal efforts, has used the society facilities. Thus, by helping poor people, they are responding to the efforts of society for them. For example, every month I try to pay some charities which take care of children with canser disease. I am really satisfied with this social activity at the end of each month because, I think I am reacting to the problem of a society that has helped me grow and gain money when I needed that.
Moreover, the rich parents should help fund-raising communities in order to teach their children to continue this chain. In Fact, children are prone to imitate useful activities their parents perform. A great asset of this, is to cintinue the chain of helping others, which in long-term, would be beneficial for all members of society. For instance, maybe the children or grand children of reach people would suffer from some financial problems in future, so if there are still people who help the charities, the grand children of current rich people, would be benefitted by the helps of wealthy people.
To sum up, I believe it would be a great notion for rich people to give away to charity organizations, not only by addressing their own sense of satisfaction as well as responding to society helps but also by helping their children to continue the chain of helping the others which would guaranty their future, when their grand children may need help.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
Today, with an increase in economical issues a great part of the society are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s, I think in addition to the government , it is the responsibility of rich people...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: '' or ''.
Suggestion: ;
... Moreover, the rich parents should help fund-raising communities in order to teach their chi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...uld suffer from some financial problems in future, so if there are still people who help ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...oblems in future, so if there are still people who help the charities, the grand child...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75988401404 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525993883792 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9826370279 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 5.45110844103 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805819518095 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286419727246 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023244669348 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505902137134 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201178622796 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.