Most change is not necessarily progress.
A glance at many kinds of changes in personal and social level brings a light question that several times provoked discussions, that is, whether those changes directly lead to progress to individuals or communities. Some people contend that all changes mean development in society. However, I would like to suggest that not all changes are connected to a progressive consequence, in terms of trend and adaptation, as well as a political change. In the ensuing paragraph, I will try to shed some light on this point of view through ample examples and conspicuous reasons.
The exquisite point to be mentioned firstly is that changes might merely present specific trends. The contemporary Korean food industry will provide a clear example for this opinion. For past few years, there have been countless trends in exotic food that people got crazed for. Those food include 'real honey chip ice cream', 'soft Taipei castella bread' and the list goes on. However, theses trend had nothing to do with the improvement in general cuisine culture, nor the sanitary issues in the food industry. Instead, they just whipped out people's money for a short period of time.
Another point to be mentioned is that changes can be a form of adaptation. My personal experience will demonstrate this standpoint. When I was young, I was an introverted and shy kid, and this characteristic of mind made me hard to related to people. Nonetheless, as I grow up and started doing a job, I had no other option but to pretend myself as a sociable person. This is because the society does not like people who do not go well with others, and for this reason, they regard the outgoing personality as a high value. As a result, I am an outgoing person now. But noting in my mind had changed, and I feel even depressed for my situation that I always have to fake my smile and mood.
Although the above mentioned reasons cross the mind at a first sight, it does not mean that they are the only one. Actually, there is another subtle point that has to be borne in mind. It should be noted that some of the changes might backward the preexisting progress. For instance, the president of Philippine right now is notorious for his violent security policies, and more seriously, his homophobic and misogynic political stance. It was reported that several months after he was elected, many laws regarding women and LGBT people changed in a way that punishes them strictly. This shows that bad political changes bring the society backward.
Due to the foregoing ground, I firmly believe that not all changes bring progress, and trend, adaptation, and political aspect are 3 prime and momentous reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'Those foods'?
Suggestion: This food; Those foods
...exotic food that people got crazed for. Those food include real honey chip ice cream, soft...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t whipped out peoples money for a short period of time. Another point to be mentioned is that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... borne in mind. It should be noted that some of the changes might backward the preexisting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85054945055 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65334352394 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573626373626 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8070136327 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9583333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9583333333 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152527859551 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465308961976 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667558042164 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105586391337 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714774532876 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.