Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons or individual countries. In other words, it is an international problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the environment has been severely damaged due to human activities. This results in myriad disasters such as global warming, earthquake, volcanic eruption, depletion of the ozone layer, and so on. There has been a lot of heated debate about managing environmental issues. While some people are inclined toward the idea that environmental concerns can be solved by individual persons and individual countries, I believe that t environmental problems are a worldwide crisis and the world should unite and tackle these problems with cooperation with each other. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first reason coming to my mind is that the environmental problems are not created by a single country, but most countries have involved in these problems. This crisis impacts all countries from the northern hemisphere to the southern hemisphere. Therefore, all nations should participate in efficient and powerful actions against these problems. Otherwise, these problems will get worse and bring about massive damage to our planet in the near future. For instance, as countries have other issues that need budget like education, economic problems, health section, some countries, especially developing countries might ignore the environmental problems. Consequently, despite effective actions conduct by some countries, the problems remain unsolved.
Another noteworthy reason is that as the crisis is worldwide, it needs a great number of resources and knowledge, and time that cannot provide to individuals and single countries. There have been a various ety number of environmental concerns with different spread; as a result, the government should allocate an enormous amount of money for each phenomenon to handle the problem. Thus, the cost should divide among all countries to decline the burden of those massive costs. For example, an international organization that consisted of all nations’ representatives can divide the costs between all countries; then force them to pay their shares. The international organization can enact legislation to ensure that the laws are followed by all countries, or else punish them by international sanctions.
From what has been discussed above, we can conclude that the only way to cope with the environmental issues is a cooperation of all countries together to mitigate the environmental problems since these problems are not caused by a single country or individual. Moreover, solving these problems is money and time-consuming which cannot afford by a single country and the expenditure should be shared with all countries across the globe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed with all countries across the globe.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54146341463 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02686366208 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551219512195 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1370861932 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24610134232 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069776598893 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658774824951 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156120756851 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359027406791 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.