Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons or individual countries. In other words, it is an international problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the environment has been severely damaged due to human activities. This results in myriad disasters such as global warming, desertification, deforestation, depletion of the ozone layer, and so on. There has been a lot of heated debate about managing environmental issues. While some people are inclined toward the idea that environmental concerns can be solved by individual persons and individual countries, I believe that environmental problem is a worldwide crisis and the world should unite and tackle these problems with cooperation with each other. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first reason coming to my mind is that the environmental problems are not created by a single country, most countries have involved in these problems. These crisis situations impact all countries from the northern hemisphere to the southern hemisphere. Therefore, all nations should participate in efficient and powerful actions against these problems. Otherwise, these problems will get worse and bring about massive damage to our planet in the near future. For example, it is impossible to combat water pollution if one country devotes considerable efforts in saving pure water when another country in the other half of the world keeps contaminating by dumping a huge amount of wastes into the ocean.
Another noteworthy reason is that since the crisis is widespread and universal, it needs a great number of resources and knowledge, and time that cannot be provided by individuals and a single country. There are various environmental concerns with different spread; as a result, the government should allocate an enormous amount of money for each phenomenon to handle the problem. Since the countries have other issues like health insurance, improving infrastructure, and developing education systems that need to support them as well, they cannot cover all environmental costs by themselves. One of the best solutions for this problem is dividing the costs among all countries. For example, an international organization that consisted of all nations’ representatives can split the costs between all countries; then force them to pay their shares by enactment legislation to ensure all countries engage in this cost or else punish them by international sanctions.
From what has been discussed above, we can conclude that the only way to cope with the environmental issues is a cooperation of all countries together to mitigate the environmental problems since these problems are not caused by a single country or individual action. Moreover, solving these problems is money and time-consuming which cannot afford by a single country and the expenditure should be shared with all countries across the globe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43218390805 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05712555301 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8502383253 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5882352941 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258856107567 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768393647962 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721690061826 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168570692016 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464525275863 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.