Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past
In this hectic life, helping each other plays a vital role in communities. Much breath and ink are extended in arguing about aim to strange people or not. While some people think that nowadays, people are eager to help unknown ones, others believe that helping to unfamiliar one is not a ubiquitous issue among today's generation. When it comes to me, I firmly concur with the first statement, that helping other unknown people has been increasing. There are several reasons to support this idea; two of them elaborated in the following article.
First and foremost, Nowadays, helping to strange is affordable for some people due to improving people’s quality of life. In other words, most people had lived below the poverty line in the past, yet due to the industrial revolution, most people can enhance their lives quality. As a result, when we have wealthy ones in the communities, it is more likely that these people could help unknown ones in contrast to the situation in which we have a miserable one. To explain more, in previous lives, only people who belonged to minority groups such as kings and queens family had plenty of money to the donor for charity, yet today we saw many volunteers and even regular people who are ambitious to raise money for the homeless people. For instance, in today's' community, many people are volunteers to build a shelter for needy ones and create a career opportunity for them.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that today, most people are willing to help unknown ones due to accessing modern technology. Accordingly, due to information technology, nowadays, a large group of people has access to social networks, and in this way, they can easily communicate with each other. That is to say, when people can reach out to each other comfortably and quickly, they may have more eager to help other ones. Similarly, owing to expanding new technology, most people can recognize their communities' problems, such as knowing poor people. On the other hand, most people in the past could not detect poor people in their communities. They could only know their adjacent people, and as a result, could not access to the distant needy people. For example, most non-profitable companies try to raise money for homeless people using the internet's option, like providing credit cards for benevolent ones. Consequently, because new technology helps donators be comfortable and unknown when they want to give strangers money, they are ambitious to donate money for needy peoples—the more chance they give money to unknown people.
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one-thir 73
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a national newspaper."Your recent article on corporate downsizing* in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship 86
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 66
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienc 39
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to wide 87
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 428 350
No. of Characters: 2085 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.548 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.871 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.469 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.344 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.382 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.382 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.175 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5