A glance at people's attitudes towards helping brings light to a question that has been debated for a long time; whether current society is more helpful than our ancestors. Although it is popular to look down upon the present community, I believe that we are more generous than our ancestors. In what follows, I will elaborate and explain what my perspective is based on.
First of all, the current generation has a higher education level than previous generations. With the development of education techniques and systems, nowadays, schools give more priority to moral education. Therefore, students know why we need to help others. They understand that helping is a chain reaction, which begins from a tiny spark and spreads across society. For instance, when I was in primary school, my class teacher encouraged students to help others, and she had a star rating system to choose the most helpful student. Therefore, everyone tries to help others. Most of the time, this help is small things like giving a pencil or pen. But what we did was to train our minds to help others to the best of our abilities. Today, I am proud to say that most of my friends from primary school are famous philanthropists in the city. This all started with giving a pencil to the friend next to you.
Secondly, unlike past, today people have a higher quality of life. Where they do not need to worry about wild animal attacks. They have enough food to supply for their families. In contrast, the battle for survival forced people to first think about you and your families in the past. If you share food with your neighbor, your children might have to fill their stomachs with just water. In other words, most of our ancestors did not have the capacity to help others. However, with the progression of human civilization and technology, current society enjoys prosperity. This has increased people's ability to help. The battle is no longer to survive yourself and your family; it is to go forward with society.
However, some believe that contemporary society is more selfish, and they use news about thefts murders from papers and other media as proof. However, if one looks at it more carefully, they will uncover that these news sources and social media contains more about good people who give their helping hands, sometimes for thousands of unknowns. Additionally, the development of social media has encouraged people to help others more. For instance, celebrities and influencers usually post videos about assisting poor people, encouraging their fans to do the same.
Nowadays, people are educated, and they understand the importance of helping others. Additionally, with the increase of the quality of life, current society can help others more than our ancestors. Moreover, we can see that social media also encourage people to help others. For these reasons, I firmly believe that we are fortunate to live in a helpful society, which has lengthened their helping hands progressively.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y people have a higher quality of life. Where they do not need to worry about wild an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2491.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01207243461 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61546199248 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51106639839 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0016958686 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0333333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5666666667 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31778785875 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844899667198 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712161616106 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183458738945 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414528652554 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y people have a higher quality of life. Where they do not need to worry about wild an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2491.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01207243461 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61546199248 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51106639839 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0016958686 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0333333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5666666667 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31778785875 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844899667198 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712161616106 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183458738945 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414528652554 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.