One can learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has.
Nowadays, a friend is playing an important role in our daily life. People are more likely to spend their spare time with friends. As far as I am concerned, we are able to know a lot about a person from the type of his or her friends, and two reasons will suffice here to support my point of view.
First, there is a tendency that people prefer to close to a person who share lots of similarities with them. Thus, people and their friends are similar in many ways. Friendship does not just arise from people’s staying together. For one thing, they share similar interest, having alike values, pursue in the same direction. As we know, students are more likely to make friends in the extracurricular activities, for they are able to find one who share the same interest with them. Moreover, adults want to make friends with who have the same values because this kind of friends help them achieve success easily. For another, people who share the same living standards and financial ability are more likely to become friends. However, if people have plenty of differences between themselves and others, they may not become friends, since they will have lots of arguments. It is a common sense that, kind-heated people will not make friends with people who are evil. In this case, people can learn something about a person from his or her friends.
In China, there is a proverb, lies down with “dogs must rise up with fleas.” Since people have spent a long time with their friends, they might be influenced by their friends. Take me for example, one of my best friends who is extremely hard-working in her study. Before I met her, I was very lazy and I did not like study so my grades were really poor. In contrast, after we becoming good friends, she usually took me to the library to help me do my homework or prepare for my exams. After a period of time, I was interested in studying gradually and arduous about my assignments. Thanks to her, I got an A in my final exam last semester. Therefore, I become more similar as her than before. In this way, it is likely to recognize some traits of a person through his friends.
In conclusion, it is available to know a people through the type of friends he or she has. It is a good way for people to get aware of others comprehensively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...eover, adults want to make friends with who have the same values because this kind ...
^^^
Line 9, column 504, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...mework or prepare for my exams. After a period of time, I was interested in studying gradually...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 614, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: an; A
...ut my assignments. Thanks to her, I got an A in my final exam last semester. Therefo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76426799007 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.96371827343 2.67179642975 186% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511166253102 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5774419931 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4782608696 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5217391304 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52173913043 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221774712141 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677984330943 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882288064406 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137052864512 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544161554536 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.