In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
In today's hectic life with numerous events happening all across the world, being well informed and have a comprehensive horizon is crucial. In this regard, some people approve of this concept that humankind should seek information from a variety of resources. On the contrary, others hold the opposit point of view stating access to the limited resources is adequate. Personally, I concur with the idea that more information are gained from a different resource, the broader area of knowledge, and expertise. I substantiate my standpoint with some explanation as follows.
To commence with, it is pivotal to access copies of resource information for expanding wisdom due to the fact majority of news have obsolete or biased leading to misinterpretation. To put in more vivid pictures, prejudiced or biased information revealing especially in political scope is inevitable in the news world. Should people rely on merely a few news resources, the insufficient or deceptive could have resulted in massive miscomprehension. To illustrate, in IRAN many press and media are under the supervision of various parties that direct them to release news and evidence against their opponent exclusively in the presidential election. Taken this into consideration, should people have exposure to such misleading news and be deprived of information about other parties, this will have an adverse influence on opting for the qualified person as a president which has a direct association with their future life.
The second reason comes into my mind is that every news resource confines to cover few scopes of events and focus on a specific topic including politics, sport, or economic, therefore, it is inevitable to acquire information from several resources in order to dominate over the news all over the world. To shed light on this, in IRAN varzesh3 is a well-known and popular sports news platform which updated merely with news about sport's event from Iran and abroad and does not elaborate on other fields of news or barely subscribes on non-sport news as commercial. Should people utilizing this platform as the main information resource and do not explore more facet of events comprising cocultural or economical, the level of their knowledge will not boost and they remain a parochial and narrow-minded person.
To draw a conclusion. I strongly advocate the notion that broader minded and well-informed person harness various information resource. It is because by the avoidance of using different news, not only do human beings mislead by deceptive and fake news, but they also are not capable of improving their awareness about their surroundings owing to the reliance on news that focuses on merely a few topics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-16 | saras | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun press seems to be countable; consider using: 'many presses'.
Suggestion: many presses
...iscomprehension. To illustrate, in IRAN many press and media are under the supervision of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, therefore, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26728110599 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97381452161 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541474654378 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.397634568 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.875 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368877760224 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110882107493 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685245184404 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230621247132 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225557090751 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.