In order to well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.
Nowadays, people have accessed a plethora of resources that they can utilize in order to be informed about the events and happenings all around the world. In this regard, some individuals believe that ones who get information from a wide variety of news sources will be well informed. I personally think, although using many different news resources have some advantages for individuals, this action's drawbacks are more than its benefits. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my point of view.
Firstly, using plenty of resources is a time-consuming process. It is obvious that people have been facing numerous challenges and news, which have affected their lives in many aspects. Therefore, if they check many sources about this news before making a decision, it will take much time. Furthermore, in some cases, most of the news resources are same because they copy from each other without checking and analyzing the truth of that news. On the other hand, if people choose an appropriate and well-known resource that they are famous because of their reliable news, ones can access a piece of exact information that they need. Thus, it can be easily concluded that not only can they get reliable information, but also they can save their time.
Furthermore, people would have a better insight into their decision that they need to make. One of the most predominant factors that people should be considered when they check news is that who published this news. Most of the websites strive to attract more reviewer and increase their fame in society. It is needless to say, and they publish some fake news to reach this aim. In these situations, if people visit most sites, they cannot reach a good conclusion because news has different views. Therefore, people lost themselves among a lot of information that they do not know which one is correct and cover the story completely. Moreover, their minds will be occupied with much unnecessary information and prevent them from concentrating on the main points. In these cases, it is very hard to distinguish among the information.
To wrap it up, I am of the opinion that using one reliable source provide more benefits for people. Not only do they save their time, but also they make a better decision about the news that they read. It is suggested for people to allocate some time to find an appropriate website that publishes more reliable news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med. I personally think, although using many different news resources have some advantages for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s have some advantages for individuals, this actions drawbacks are more than its ben...
^^^^
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I will elaborate on my point of view. Firstly, using plenty of resources is a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., but also they can save their time. Furthermore, people would have a better ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'reviewer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: reviewer
... Most of the websites strive to attract more reviewer and increase their fame in society. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96543209877 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.625765433 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501234567901 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8936014595 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7619047619 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199599144986 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606482915007 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061087627485 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138019148886 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084830998129 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.