Parents should set strict rules to their children if they want them to succeed in the future.
Competition among the teenagers is becoming increasingly serious with the highly developed society and improved education level. Parents are aware of helping their children to achieve success in the future through setting strict rules. From my perspective, I do agree with that moderately strict rules can benefit children a lot.
First of all, academic study always plays an important role for children, especially in parents’ eyes. Thus, controlling the study time and restricting the behavior is a good approach to improve children’s examination scores, which requires relatively strict rules. If parents do not care about the school work, it is more likely that children also do not effort to study and get perfect grades. On the contrary, it is also not a good choice to design rules excessively, such as forcing children to finish assignments all day long. Children easily accumulate a growing number of pressure and cannot find a way to release it. If things go on like that, they will create negative emotion so that it is more hardly to performance better on study. That is why I mentioned, setting up moderately strict rules can come in hand for children.
When it comes to entertainment, numerous parents always worry about their children about spending too much time on using electric products, such as computer and smartphone, since the technology developed rapidly and children at young age are less resistant to internet. There are plenty of news cases report that children are addicted in playing games and give up study thoroughly without parents’ arrangement. Therefore, drawing up rules is necessary to avoid disasters caused by varieties of entertainment activities for children in order to better themselves and succeed. However, as we know technology products have the function of expanding horizon in the spare time and changing the anxiety into relax mood, which is beneficial. So, parents are not supposed to totally forbid children to utilize this kind of entertainment fashion.
Moreover, most parents frequently concentrate on children’s friend relationship. It is obvious that they expect their children to get along with friend who are excellent. To be more specific, the people with moral virtue and talent for some subjects are popular in adult’s world. Oppositely, parents do not allow their children to associate with someone behaviors bad. But they should not ask children keep in touch with or stay away from the people who they evaluate according to surficial appearance. Take me for example, my parents have told me not to judge a person before you deeply understand him. Besides, they do not make a regulation for me about friends. So, I get the chance to meet friends with different characters and truly draw on somethings valuable from them that also give me a hand to become an easy-going person and final reach the success. Thus, the awareness of not being too strict is of importance.
To put it in a nut shell, Parents should set rules to their children if they want them to succeed in the future, but not excessively strict. The extent about the rules is worth considering.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, kind of, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2632.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.140625 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79099580666 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556640625 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5422945372 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.230769231 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34615384615 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436372816693 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11447485669 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131088216562 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285300848126 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155101002092 0.0645574589148 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.