People can solve their important problems by themselves or by their families, thus, it is almost not necessary to refer to the government .do you agree or disagree?
Resolving problems without referring to the authoritative system mayhap were achieved in the past or so they say. Some crowd concludes attributing issues to a specialist does not appear a decent idea so refers to individuals or relatives. However, in this writer’s opinion; resolutely dissent from the people's potential to administer their crucial troubles without citing to the executive sovereignty and this essay will explain why.
First, some significant problems include the essence of ignoring other people’s rights in varied ways could not be enough recognized by an unexperienced referee and needs to determine to evaluate in a processed method through associations like germane courts which means sophisticated troubles should be submitted to a higher-ranked administration. Societies face a decent number of crimes that have been remaining unsolved since no one has the whole decisive information to elucidate the ambiguity of, thus, how we hold the irrational expectation of the solution by an ordinary person. For instance, once someone has been missed in our neighborhood then the whole family which was an extended type, strived to find him and expended plenty of capital, however, the issue remained undiscovered prior to involving police to decode the investigation eventually saved his life from a kidnapping bound. Moreover, another negative aspect may arise when nonmanagerial crowd long to clarify a question, once I fell into conflict in my personal life with my cousin. Some relatives encouraged us to settle the dispute in the traditional familial associations and not only did not get concluded but even got more convoluted due to the fact that a familial bias caused both sides could not be realized unequally and yet it remained unsolved before deciding to visit a consultant.
Second, referring crucial snag to your friends or family will usually arise weird repercussions such as illogical irrelevant personal expectation how a Persian proverb says," cats don’t catch mice simply for the sake of Go"‘ which means nothing is done unintentionally or pricelessly, so that if a relative reconciles a botheration a compensation will normally be requested. Taking one of my experiences as an example, I indulged in a financial squeeze throughout educating period, while a family member accepted to lend me the fund, however after a while demanded such an inappropriate aid which appeared almost impossible to do consequently both our relation devastated and after a struggle, we were convicted to be jailed .what if I inquired the sum from a bank either the issue was unraveled formally or I felt independent plus relieved as well. These are some disputes that naturally have no way just referring to the government to be concluded.
In conclusion, generally speaking, varied types of issues you encounter within life whether personal or social, although rudimentary kinds may appear to be clarified easily, nonetheless, arduous types should be referred to the government otherwise facing complications, bias judgments, and unpredictable expectations would be inevitable consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...l expectation how a Persian proverb says,' cats don’t catch mice simply for the s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if a relative reconciles a botheration a compensation will normally be requested....
^^^
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...struggle, we were convicted to be jailed .what if I inquired the sum from a bank e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2652.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5020746888 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18523856811 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 212.727598566 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636929460581 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.1344086022 199% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.126949171 48.9658058833 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 221.0 100.406767564 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.1666666667 20.6045352989 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.45110844103 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11800190989 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407955615112 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215573745672 0.0737576698707 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692135257388 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207948938793 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.6 11.7677419355 209% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 13.96 58.1214874552 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.3 10.1575268817 210% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.51 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.01818996416 137% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.0537634409 179% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.