Nowadays, people are beginning to attach increasing importance to the natural environment. An issue concerning the best strategy to improve local environment has triggered a heated discussion. On a personal level, I believe that planting trees and creating parks are the best compared with improving public transportation and reducing plastic bags.
To begin with, I understand some people may question my choice. First of all, public transportation may reduce the volume of private cars on roads, which is one of the main causes of air pollution. If more people have a convenient access to public transportation such as subways and buses, the emission of waste gases caused by vehicles, including carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, would decline. For another, since the plastic bags are not recyclable and would cost many years to be disposed by nature, they dramatically damage local lands and make them hard for plants to survive.
Reasonable as the above argument seems, in my opinion, it is biased and short-sighted. From my experience, the resources of public transportation are abundant, based on a recent survey showing that a great number of buses are quite empty. Besides, with the development of novel materials, nowadays plastic bags made by environmental-friendly polymers do little harm to the local ecosystem. Above all measures, it is the public's awareness of protecting the environment that matters most. And there is no doubt that plants and parks help to encourage citizens to live a more eco-friendly lifestyle.
To be more specific, people can enjoy their weekends at parks to enjoy the beauty of the nature. For example, I always go to a picnic in a near park with my family. We breathe the fresh air, enjoy the beautiful flowers and listening to birds' joyful songs. Everything there shows us the importance of protecting the nature and makes us pay more attention to our actions which may be harmful to the environment. In this way, we tend to choose buses instead of driving cars when commuting and bring our own bags when shopping instead of using plastic bags. More importantly, trees can improve the air quality by absorbing toxic gases and generating oxygen.
To sum up, I firmly believe that planting trees and building parks are more meaningful in the long run, since they can not only improve the current environment condition but also increase people's awareness of protecting the environment.
- Which do you prefer an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 83
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 42
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why 88
- people should help charities by giving extra money of their wealth 83
- The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'convenient access'.
Suggestion: convenient access
...s of air pollution. If more people have a convenient access to public transportation such as subway...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...cosystem. Above all measures, it is the publics awareness of protecting the environment...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, for example, no doubt, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15909090909 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95671055092 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3643910776 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.526315789 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25058197059 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674329271718 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507138673154 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139748920409 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375554725455 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.