Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Our modern life is much more complicated than three decades ago, and goventments have limitid budget to provide services for people. While some people believe that the internet access should be free for all people in the community, others agree with the obverse idea. Nevertheless, from my point of view, The internet access should not be offered to people without any cost. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, if people have the internet access with no fee, a lot of people will spend their time in the internet. There is no doubt that social media has an important impact on modern life, and the communication applications and softwears are very useful for connecting with other people. Although the internet has a lot of benefits for people, overusing of the internet can be serious problem for societies. Moreover, youth use the internet for connecting with each other, gaming, upload or download videos or pictures, and sharing experience in social media platforms. Thus, the internet is extremely attractive for a lot of members in the community, and spending such a huge time in the internet can make major problems for a society. The more people keep surfing in the internet, the less they can be productive for country. The government can control this situation by getting fee for internet access. Therefore, a lot of people will use the internet as they need it.
Furthermore, plenty of other services that governments provide for people is not totaly free, and people have to pay for these services. However, the cost of services is indirect, the governments get cost from taxing or private companies. The governments especially in some countries have limited money and they cannot give this money for services such as internet access. On the other hand, there are other services that have priority for all people in the community such as public health and public transportation. By wasting the money for internet access a large number of population can be unsatisfied from the government and this can make conlict in the country. Obviously, some of society members need internet for important things such as research, online businesses and education. There is no doubt that they can afford for internet. For example, in my country, internet access is not completely free, but all people are able to buy an internet package according their usage, so there is no need the government makes internet fully free for all people. Instead, the government can vast the money for public transportation and renew facilities, which all people like to use.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government is not responsible to offer free internet access for all citizens. This is because a lot of young people spend their whole time in the internet and they will lose their opportunities in the community, and also the government should provide other services, which are more important than the internet access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the community such as public health and public transportation. By wasting the mo...
^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y wasting the money for internet access a large number of population can be unsatisfied from the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore important than the internet access.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68590853962 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432323232323 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7119372638 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.086956522 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65217391304 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364364867979 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137755286721 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07750478562 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285305385088 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693517942391 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.