Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is an indisputable fact that human is a social creature. In this regard, establish a connection with other people and keep the relationship, is one of the essential steps in socializing. With this in mind, some people approve of this idea that when it comes to happiness, keeping a friendship with a given number of friends for long period is more advantageous. On the contrary, others hold the opposite point of view stating making a new friend with ease is a contributing factor to a more enjoyable life. Personally, I concur with the former group owing to the reason substantiated as follows.
To commence with, the more time passing from starting the friendship, the more cementing relationship and strengthening trust between friends leading to a friend be more exuberant. It is crystal clear, trust considers as the pillar of every human connection which is form by time passage and reciprocity by appropriate behaviors. In this respect, should trust establish and flourish, the friends will become strong loyal and will know they can count on each other in both predicament and sough-after period of life that culminates in inject a sense of support to the life, reduce anxiety ensue from loneliness and increase happiness, into the bargain. Conversely, in pristine friendship, the level of trust between a newly acquainted fellow is superficial and needs tremendous time and communication in order to fortify the relationship to the climax of trust and pleasurable.
The second worth-mentioning reason that comes to my mind is that should people spend more time with a like-minded friend for long period, they will become more familiar with their attitude giving rise to share an enjoyable moment. To elucidate this point, as time passes, human beings' comprehension from their partner mindset improves and they find similarities in taste and attitude between each other. In this vein of thought, the more time dedicated to hanging out with an analogous friend, the more comfortability in connection since peers is well aware of their behavior and opinion of their partner variety of subjects which create an atmosphere conducive to constructive communication and achieve delightful moments, as a result.
To draw a conclusion, I strongly advocate the notion that the ability to keep friends for long period is more lucrative in order to bring more ebullient in life. This is because not only does the long-term connection with trusted people bring a sense of being supported and put the mind at ease due to the reason they can count on each other in difficult situations, but it also provides an opportunity for more comfortable and pleasant communication with like-minded friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...idate this point, as time passes, human beings comprehension from their partner mindse...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, second, so, then, well, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15525114155 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99437209718 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1197150098 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.285714286 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252791828899 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972170086309 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743281993082 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171861185728 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458948457267 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.