Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
People have differing views with regard to the idea of whether it is more important to watch or read news in one side, either agree or disagree with our opinion. While some people believe that news should be compatible with their ideas, I disagree with the idea and believe that news must be both-sided.
The first reason is that reading or watching the news should be informative in all aspects. At present, technological development has made great progress in accessing the best and more accurate news that happened all around the world. This means that most people are trying to follow the news to know a various range of news from their own country to global news. It, therefore, is more important to follow those kinds of news that cover all of the aspects, rather than those that express only one side of the news. In other words, this kind of news not only would not be useful, but also have some negative consequences such as unknown with other important subjects happened. Finally, to have comprehensive knowledge of the news, it is more beneficial to read or watch news considering both sides of opinion.
Another subtle point is that we cannot contribute positively to discussion if we see only one side of the news. In our globalized world, individuals can expect to come into contact with more people who have different backgrounds. It is more important to communicate with them properly. For example, we likely have a chance to negotiate or discuss with someone around a specific matter that happened in the world. Having competent knowledge around that matter plays an important role in our success if we wish to remain successful. In my view, watching or reading news can serve to educate us and maybe act as a talking point or landmarks in our discussion. If we see one side of the subject, even agree with them or not, it is likely that we fail in that negotiation or discussion.
In conclusion, it is clear that having comprehensive knowledge around subject and news leads to be more successful in any discussion.
- Question Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Actually many archaeologists believe that the coin discussed in the reading is not a fake They believe it represents genuine evidence that the Norse came into contact with Native Americans a thousand years ago First the great distance of the Maine site fr 75
- male professor The reading s arguments that the photographic negatives were created by Ansel Adams are not convincing It s true that the negatives have some similarities to Adams work but there are explanations for those similarities First the leaning pin 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Question Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a go 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...o follow those kinds of news that cover all of the aspects, rather than those that express...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my view, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80113636364 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6537375697 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491477272727 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2904996985 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.625 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330516165432 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119490107938 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833055591441 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198348900894 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103121122973 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.