Question:Some people think that educational programs are best understood when listened to on the radio while others think that it's better to watch these programs on In your opinion, which is the best way to learn from the program, television or radio? Use details and examples to support your answer
It is general believed that when information comes with visual image or video the brain can perceive fast and better the information. In other hand the radio may increase the imagination. In my opinion educational programs are more attractive and productive when they are showed on Tv. I think that for the reason below.
First, the educational programs on TV are better than listened to on radio inasmuch as the information on Tv is easy understood. The Tv help to present the information illustration with images, videos and music that are put easy deep on brain. For instance one year ago, my university organized the third conference in accounting. The first recall for paper was announced on the radio, but I do not pay attention on it. Meanwhile after one day I saw the same recall on tv and the images and video about the topic of the conference was slight easy for me and I decide to go and being part of this educational program.
Second, the images, the videos and the different diagrams used to transmit the message of the educational programs are more attractive and make the information more reliable. For example, parents are understanding better the problems causing by mobile phone to their children when they see videos and real fact on tv. In other hand this educational program on radio is not understood. Additional, the aim of the program to prevent the children by using the mobiles phone is not completed because of the wrong way to transmit it.
In conclusion the aim and the information of the educational programs are easy perceive when they appear on television. Hence in my opinion the radio is less attractive and do not transmit the aim of the programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nasmuch as the information on Tv is easy understood. The Tv help to present the i...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or paper was announced on the radio, but I do not pay attention on it. Meanwhile ...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...dio, but I do not pay attention on it. Meanwhile after one day I saw the same recall on ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... topic of the conference was slight easy for me and I decide to go and being part...
^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to go and being part of this educational program. Second, the images, the video...
^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ion more reliable. For example, parents are understanding better the problems causing by mobile p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...erceive when they appear on television. Hence in my opinion the radio is less attract...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, third, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81099656357 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78464191289 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4421776231 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255039376292 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104535043999 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895655327303 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172380931672 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330762724268 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.