Reading is more educational than watching movies or TV.
Is reading more educational than watching movies? Although many people would agree with the former statement, I would subscribe my opinion to the opposite of it. I would bolster to watch movies over reading books for the reasons briefly elucidated in below paragraphs.
First imperative reason for watching movies instead of reading books is that it makes the process of understanding involving subjects more comprehensible. For example, I wasn't amused much when I read the diameter of Sun in book. However, I was completely flabbergasted by colossal size of Sun when I watched the documentary -Cosmos. Our Earth seems to be the a small particle when Sun and Earth are viewed in the same screen. Also after watching that movie, I had a far better understanding of our universe which otherwise would have been difficult for me to comprehend.
Secondly, reading requires us to imagine the things which is sometime quite an arduous task. Whereas when we watch the movie, involving task of imagination is competely taken care by the movie. My fascination towards robotics is the perfect illustartion. I had learned about how robots functions by reading few books. However, I never robotics to be intersting as it books described the robots as a simple amalgamation of algorithms, mechanism and mathematical formulas. This view of mine was competely changed when I watched fully functional robot in the movie - Iron man. I was in better position to appreciate the working of mechanism of robots as it depicted how the theoritical knowledge of phsyics can be implemented into pragmatic manner. Therefore, I posit that watching movie is more education instead of reading.
Lastly, several scientific studies asserts that our mind can retain viual information for loner period of time as compared to the information that we have recieved through reading. That holds true for my case. During my schools I used to very difficult to remember the theories of atomic models proposed by various scientist. However, when my science teacher displayed animation videos of atomic models, I was able to understand atoms more clearly. Thus, I would prefer to watch movies over reading book.
To sum up, based on above stated illustrations, I find that watching movie is far more effective in understanding the things instead of reading books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...cts more comprehensible. For example, I wasnt amused much when I read the diameter of...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...umentary -Cosmos. Our Earth seems to be the a small particle when Sun and Earth are v...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nd Earth are viewed in the same screen. Also after watching that movie, I had a far ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... can retain viual information for loner period of time as compared to the information that we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15343915344 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91826067405 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5839859718 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331503556151 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121252093497 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192301248232 0.0737576698707 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209009625274 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905452806104 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.