Recently some students need to arrive at school at early in the morning. Some people think that starting school day early is a good approach to support learning, while other people think that starting school day at the later time is a good approach to support learning. What is your suggestion?
The starting time of the school day, an issue directly concerned with the academic performance of students, is now being controversially debated about which will be a better choice to support students’ learning between starting school at an early time and at a later time. Personally, I am convinced that starting school later will do favor to the performance of students at school.
Admittedly, having an earlier beginning of the school day may be somewhat beneficial to their study. Most importantly, students can be encouraged to have a more proper time arrangement when they get up earlier to have classes. When students are required to get up earlier to go to school, they may have to force themselves to go to bed earlier since they need to ensure they will still be attendant in the upcoming day. Going to bed earlier and then waking up earlier will help them maintain a fine body condition. Also, they may enjoy a better usable time period as the result of being awaked at a early time. In either way, they are likely to obtain better grades as the result of the higher study efficiency gained from a better body condition as well as finer time period used o study.
Despite this, the benefits derived from starting school day early pale in comparison of what students can fulfill academically. Primarily, starting school a later time will be a better choice because at later time students are more likely to be capable of tackling academic work. When getting up later, students are able to have clearer brains because of the enough sleeping time. In this case, when handling a wide range of subjects learned in school, students tend to be more activated. In this case, their study can be to an extensive degree supported. Apart from this, students can end up a day’ s study at a relatively later time to compensate for later starting point. In order to rule out the possibility of being unable to deal with a variety of subjects taken responsibility by the early starting point, school may as well ask students to take more night time courses other than morning courses. In this way, the school can not only guarantee the enough study time of students but also prevent the drawbacks of getting up too early to take classes.
In brief, although early starting point of a school day may allow students to enjoy a better higher study efficiency, I will still attach greater importance to having later beginning of school because students are capable of tackling with a wide range of subjects and the flexibility of school time which can be adapted to a later ending time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...period as the result of being awaked at a early time. In either way, they are lik...
^
Line 5, column 1064, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f getting up too early to take classes. In brief, although early starting point ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng up too early to take classes. In brief, although early starting point of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, still, then, well, apart from, in brief, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81026785714 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6174718567 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430803571429 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.035592229 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.764705882 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3529411765 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303598709678 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126400910967 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933536927298 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240939166934 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929571051291 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.