School teachers have found that this year more and more students copy homework
from others, which one of the following choices is the best way to reduce this
phenomenon?
1. parents should supervise their children's study and homework and sign their names
to prove that their children do not cheat.
2. teachers should punish those children who copy homework from others.
3. teachers should assign homework that cannot be easily copied.
There are some moot points about high school students who cheat on their homework. The question of which actions will be most effective has aroused as the subject of controversy among academicians. The school is considering making some change such as asking parents to control children or increasing the punishment or asking teachers to create homework more difficult. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. When it comes to my position I strongly subscribe to the point that increasing the penalty for cheating is the best way. I have some reasons two of which will be expounded hereunder.
Punishment always has not a negative consequence, sometimes the corollary of punishment is valuable for students. To be more specific, if teachers consider the strict penalty for cheating in assignments, the student will do their homework ’s in the right way. As a case in point, I vividly remember when I was a student, I had a classmate who was very lazy and copy his assignment from other students. He never studied at home and was a feckless student. My teacher decided to consider the hard penalty for coping assignments. He stated each student who cheats in their homework could not participate in football class. Consequently, due to this punishment, every student did their homework without any deception. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that punishment sometimes is very beneficial for student
By the same token, another paramount reason is that scholar asserts that punishment in young person has a good consequence. Parents and teachers can establish some kind of penalties for children in order to modify their bad habit. My personal example demonstrates this reality when I was a high school student I was a playful student and did not study very much. therefore, I had low-grade point in mathematics. My teacher invited my father to mention my weakness In mathematics after that I decided to cheat in exams and wrote from other students. The aftermath of this action was my teacher realized my deception and consider the harsh penalty for me hence, he told my father to decline my pocket-money. Due to decreasing in my pocket-money I struggled with some difficulties which were very bad for me then I resolved to study more and get the higher point. my personal example shed some light in the point that sometimes some kind of penalty work well and have the positive sequence.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons punishments ever have not adverse impact and in some position work for the student. This kind of penalty not only change pupils behavior but also lead to some great decision in youths.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 836, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sometimes is very beneficial for student By the same token, another paramount rea...
^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ul student and did not study very much. therefore, I had low-grade point in mathematics. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...to study more and get the higher point. my personal example shed some light in the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, kind of, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02947845805 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8598968119 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498866213152 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8358210931 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4347826087 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202538981858 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688456202203 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054474419033 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13515236103 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618740907069 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.