For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers
From past years till now, educational systems have played vital roles in society and youth future lifestyles. Therefore, evaluations of mentors have become very important within the last years. There are lots of assessment systems that schools utilize for this issue; both teachers and students are involved in this process. Turning a blind eye to those who support or repudiate the contention, I lean towards the fact that teachers are highly fit for this process and could evaluate their co-workers due to the conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
The first and foremost notion which I affirm is, the scores that students get in their lessons could clearly show the performance of their teachers; therefore, with these pieces of evidence mentors could readily evaluate their co-workers. Besides; in this way, a student does not face a stressful situation because colleagues have the insight that maybe teachers figure out the name of the student who evaluates so if they say that the teacher is insufficient it will have a bad effect on their future courses with that teacher. To make a long story short I highly recommend that teacher assess his co-worker due to the facts which I assert above.
The latter hint I have is, in comparison with pupils because teachers are mature; hence, they could make more rational decisions. At the age of students, they become more emotional and their activities dramatically are affected by their feelings so that it is not wise to dedicate this important responsibility to them; because these kinds of evaluations directly influence the quality of future society. I expand on with one of my personal experiences, when I was a student I really hated one of my teachers for no reason; she was an ambitious teacher who could teach such arduous lessons perfectly. When the school asked us to evaluate the teachers I assessed her as a low-level tutor merely because I hated her and the school fired her. You see just base on my emotions one of our qualified teachers fired.
To make a long story short, in order to have a sufficient evaluation which could assist us capturing the best decision that directly affects the quality of our future society; I retrieve that a teacher be the best person to evaluate her colleagues due to the facts that not only it is a rational decision has to take by mature people but also is it easier for teachers and less stressful for scholars to make a determination.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91127098321 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69494862194 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513189448441 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.9756877968 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.538461538 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0769230769 20.6045352989 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300065634512 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115577771521 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822969408996 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194032629133 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411908478537 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.