Should university students attend classes?
Either you are a bachelor, master, or a Ph.D. student you choose by your own authority to be one. In other words your enthusiastic guide you to be a university student. At each level of studying, certain courses must be completed through traditional and virtual classes and each course has its advantages and disadvantages.
In my view, traditional classes are crucial for specific kind of lessons like; medical courses, practical civil engineering, photography or other subjects that need a face to face recognition. For instance; the photography exposure is a very important lesson which should be learned by collaboration in a class. Or medical subjects also has special necessity of visiting hospitals and patients.
Other courses like; geography, history, ecology, computer programming, and literature, for example, can be completed by distance learning. The saved time can be devoted to important researches. Let me give you an example to demonstrate my experience. My cousin was a computer engineering major in MIT university. He took some of his main programming course in distance learning format. It was an amazing choice since he can study and as well as participation in part time internship in C++ programming. Accordingly he finishes the university with a deep knowledge of programming.
On the other hand, some persons are nocturnal others are early birds. If the classes are only held in the mornings it has bad effects for nocturnal ones. So these characteristics can take virtual classes. The most important issue in virtual learning is facility and students and professors compatibility with this method. For example; our university presents virtual courses on welding and structural engineering. But there was always a problem. One day there was electricity issues, the other day the networking problems and so on which finishes to the closing of these courses. Note that traditional courses bring you the ability of collaboration, build your speech capability and other merits while the virtual courses can not.
As a result, in my opinion, both traditional and attending university classes are supplementary. Both have benefits. The most vital thing is that you have to use it one hundred percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e has its advantages and disadvantages. In my view, traditional classes are cruc...
^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity of visiting hospitals and patients. Other courses like; geography, history, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... history, ecology, computer programming, and literature, for example, can be comp...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to format'
Suggestion: to format
...programming course in distance learning format. It was an amazing choice since he can ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...n study and as well as participation in part time internship in C++ programming. Accordi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...rt time internship in C++ programming. Accordingly he finishes the university with a deep ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32386363636 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11670386389 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565340909091 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7735744693 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0833333333 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181815064276 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458067847747 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719234583168 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101550940218 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509931025815 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.