Shrimp industry relied on trawls
The lecture talks about the effectiveness of Turtle Excluder Device (TED). Professors believes that it is great idea to have TED installed to avoid turtles getting caught along with shrimps but there are many loopholes in the considerations made in the paragraph.
Firstly, TED is nothing but a metal barrier which does not allow any species more than 10 cm in size to get inside the trawl, however there are some species of the turtles those are smaller in size and such small, mid size turtles one example of such species is leatherback which might still get caught. Thus reducing the effectiveness of the TED.
Secondly, professor questions about the monitoring of the installed TEDs when the boats are away from the shore. The boat owners may easily remove the installed TEDs when they off shore as TED do not only avoid turtles but there are some lucky shrimps those are more than 10 cm in size and can easily escape. This affects the overall yield/ the number of shrimps getting caught. Thus the mentioned "Shrimp-Turtle Law" does not hold great value.
Thirdly, she believes that there is huge difference in the TED certification worldwide. As shrimp business is worldwide and various countries may have different checks and there are possibilities of false documentation. This questions about following required norms and the certificates might not be really valuable. Thus, having the required certificate doesn't really help the cause.
Thus, even after having the laws, check points and certifications in place to import the shrimps, there are some loopholes in the system which can be easily escaped by the traders. This questions the effectiveness of the rules and regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...e some species of the turtles those are smaller in size and such small, mid size turtles one ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
.../ the number of shrimps getting caught. Thus the mentioned 'Shrimp-Turtle Law&a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
.... Thus, having the required certificate doesnt really help the cause. Thus, even afte...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 278.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12949640288 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80516503658 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8058532134 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082028598777 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028635112323 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358100902751 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420061661984 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029146363647 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.