memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt is not accurate
The lecture responds against the consideration made in the passage which believes that the memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt is not accurate. The professors talks about the evidences which helps to believe that the memoir might be accurate.
First point she mentions is about his life in Switzerland. It is considered that he has borrowed money from the merchant and was never truly rich. But the professor explains that even though you have the property and you have to make money out of it, it has to be sold. This process takes considerable amount of time. Thus for time being he would have borrowed the money from the merchants.
Second point explains about the conversation of Chevalier with the famous writer. Critics believes that one can not remember minute details of the conversation after years of it. But the professors mentions about the records of the evidences that, Chevalier has used notes while writing his memoir. Thus it is quite possible that he would have taken the notes every night after the conversations which helped him to remember the minute details of the it.
Third point discussed is about his escape from the jail in Venice, Italy. It is claimed that he might have strong political contacts those helped him to escape. But the mention of the records by the government of Italy makes it to believe that the roof was tampered and then the sealing of roof was repaired. Also the example of other prisoners who had more powerful friend could not escape the jail supports the proof.
Thus the points professor mentions makes us to understand that she does not support the reasons mentioned in the passage about the inaccuracy of the memoir. The evidences mentioned in the lecture support her opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'talk'.
Suggestion: talk
...eingalt is not accurate. The professors talks about the evidences which helps to beli...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...cess takes considerable amount of time. Thus for time being he would have borrowed t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...as used notes while writing his memoir. Thus it is quite possible that he would have...
^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...d him to remember the minute details of the it. Third point discussed is about his es...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... then the sealing of roof was repaired. Also the example of other prisoners who had ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ot escape the jail supports the proof. Thus the points professor mentions makes us ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'points'' or 'point's'?
Suggestion: points'; point's
... the jail supports the proof. Thus the points professor mentions makes us to understa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, third, thus, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89115646259 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46885359939 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493197278912 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7355890033 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5882352941 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123536456452 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416955213859 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874524383518 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811904717726 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101201068185 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.