In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
Since the dawn of civilization, people have developed various social habits, such as smoking. Many cultures promoted different ways of smoking, and among these, hookah and tobaccos used to be very popular. At present days, some governments decided to forbid such conduits in public places. From my point a view, this measure is beneficial for most individuals, due to the fact that it prevents some illnesses and reduce the number of active and passive smokers. I will explain my statement in detail, in the following essay.
First, medical researches and statistics proved that all types of cigarettes are dangerous for health. It seems that this bad habit is the source of many serious and deadly illnesses, such as cancer and pulmonary problems. Moreover, the non-smokers tend to be more affected if they are living in the same environment with smokers. Not to mention the catastrophic consequences on children's wealth, who are more likely to develop asthma if they are exposed to cigar's smoke. In addition, many people hate the smoke and try to promote a healthy live, so it is not normal to force them to inhale a polluted air. For instance, I have never smoked and I am really disturbed when some unconscious persons smoke in the same room with me, without even asking me for the permission. I found this as a lack of respect for the other humans beings.
Second, by prohibiting smoking in public areas and institutions, the numbers of addicted person would decrease considerably. So, if they are at work, employees do not have enough time to go outside and smoke as they used to do before. For instance, I used to work in an environment that did not allow leaving the office, except for using the bathroom and for eating. A new colleague, who was an addicted smoker accepted this situation, and she was smoking only before and after the work hours. After a few months, she confessed that this impediment make her quit cigars for good. Therefore, this measure is being helpful to fight against smoking addiction.
To summarize, many salute the law that prohibits individuals to smoke in public environments. It is both an efficient way to protect people's lives, and a kind of assistance that determine humans to quit smoking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: HUMANS_BEINGS[2]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean: 'human beings'?
Suggestion: human beings
...this as a lack of respect for the other humans beings. Second, by prohibiting smoking in p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun salute seems to be countable; consider using: 'many salutes'.
Suggestion: many salutes
...nst smoking addiction. To summarize, many salute the law that prohibits individuals to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, except for, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91292875989 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70914458069 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591029023747 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0714206739 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179790720891 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506618903791 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270297799917 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105168329044 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190990544018 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.