In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
In some countries, whether people are allowed to smoke in public places and office buildings have been long time debated. In my opinion, I think smoking should be prohibited in public places and office buildings.
First, smoking is extremely unhealthy not only to smokers themselves, but also people who are nearby inhaling the smokes. According to an analytical report, smoke created with cigarettes is ten times dangerous to nearby people who inhale it than smokers themselves, such smoke is called "secondhand smoke" and it is proven to pose great threats. A medical statistics shows that children live in a family where their parents have smoking habits have higher chance to be diagnosed with diseases than their counterpart. Even though children don't smoke, the secondhand smoke caused by their parents are damaging children's bodies and they are possibly growing up with different illnesses. Symptoms are including, according to the statistic, allergy, coughing and retarded development of immune systems. Thus, smoking in public can do harm to people nearby.
Second, smoking can cause irritating working environment; therefore, have negative impacts on other people. Nowadays, cigarette industries are revolutionizing smoking experiences to attract people to continue purchasing their products. For example, fruit-flavored cigarettes or cigarettes consisted of natural spices ingredients. Such products may be pleasant to smokers, but never the non-smokers. Since these kind of products always create unacceptable, pungent smell, it annoys people who don't smoke. Imagine that you have to endure such awful smell in the office, it cannot allow people to focus on their job and even lower their wills to come to offices. Therefore, smoking in office building can negatively affect people.
Although some argue that smoking may help relieve stress. If they are suffered from heavy pressure from their families and jobs, smoking while chilling could give a temporary comfort zone and help them clear mind and so allow them to handle their issues. Nevertheless, smoking seems to have brought more negative effects than positive ones. Because smoking in public places and office buildings can not only do harm to other who don't even smoke, but also causes unpleasant environments and lower people's will to work. Therefore, I believe it is a decent rule to prohibit people from smoking in public places and office buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...their counterpart. Even though children dont smoke, the secondhand smoke caused by t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...okers, but never the non-smokers. Since these kind of products always create unacceptable,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le, pungent smell, it annoys people who dont smoke. Imagine that you have to endure ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ilding can negatively affect people. Although some argue that smoking may help reliev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dings can not only do harm to other who dont even smoke, but also causes unpleasant ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48541114058 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76365079048 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572944297082 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4049311781 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225425865625 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819306662448 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807750253793 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174522215254 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868414261956 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.