Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A serious debate between film makers and and members of a crew is about the content of the movie. some believe a movie must be funny and entertain the audience, while, others suggest that seriousness of an artwork is the key element. Consequently, there are advantages and disadvantages for both points of view. Personally, I prefer a film which concerns about the mind of it's audinces, I will bring my reasons in the following essay about this idea.
First of all, the main difference among this two form of movies is about the entertainment industry, which is a vital part of an art piece. On the other hand, an amazing movie with nothing to do on the watcher looks like waste of time. You spend several hours on something that brings nothing to your thoughts. In fact, a designed movie can guide the audience to both matters, thinking and laughing. For example, recently, I was watching a stunning movie, named to "some like it hot" which was a notable artwork and also a great comedy.
Secondly, most shallow movies are concerned to make money for film companies not to take an possitive effect on their audience. watching a commercial movie, maybe a comic one, bring dollars to the account of the director and the art manager of the project. Indeed, some individuals make artworks not only to influence deeply on others, but also to make more and more cashes. For instance, a recent research showed, pornography as the main model of entertaining movies makes money more that any other kind of films.
To sum up, I prefer to see a work of art due to adding something new to my life, not to just spend time in an unapproprite way. this consideration comes out of two main reasons, primarily, because of the importance of the influential artworks and because of the absurd connection between being a cheap movie and making more money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
A serious debate between film makers and and members of a crew is about the content ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...crew is about the content of the movie. some believe a movie must be funny and enter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ke money for film companies not to take an possitive effect on their audience. wat...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Watching
... an possitive effect on their audience. watching a commercial movie, maybe a comic one, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...just spend time in an unapproprite way. this consideration comes out of two main rea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76397515528 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67490657558 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574534161491 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.547776819 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 5.45110844103 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272439431273 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842483247729 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684320806114 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151009684284 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574414656332 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.