Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering the type of movies, I am strongly inclined to take the side of serious movies regarding the importance of deeply thinking, educational point through them and noticeable impact on the human life. Being of of the most proliferated subject in all movies, the story and the ultimate goal of movies are considered as the well-known core factor for both the audience and movies makers. Although, generally speaking, lots of people prefer to watch amusing movies regarding their fun aspect, there are remarkable advantages in watching movies designed to make the audience think.
First and foremost, the serious movies provide the high impact on the life of people. As mentioned in the title of the essay, the serious movies compel people to think deeply and even they reluctantly obligate to assess the subject that introduced in the serious movies. It is obvious that there is a causal relationship between the power of contemplation on the one hand and stimulating the emotional of audience on the other hand. As a result, bringing about the catalyst for psychological characteristics of people, can persuade them to make lots of actions. It is also worth noting that although in the first appraisal, amusing movies have more attractions compared with serious movies, the people who watched them will dramatically forget most parts of them in the short time. Moreover, because of most amuse movies have more distance from the real life adventure, they cannot make significant effect on the human life.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the educational point in the serious movies. Positively speaking, the goal of most movies maker is to address some moral things to their audience. Regarding the affinity of serious movies to the real life, the audience categorically make the tight relationship with them. In addition, considering the proliferated influence of the serious movies compared with entertaining movies, the movies makers can educate several matters to the audience. This can be referred as the feature advantage of the serious movies.
Taking all of these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the preference of serious movies regrading the numerous advantages associated with them such as educational contents, relating the significant moral points, deeply thinking about the real life problems. To my best knowledge, I highly believe that the combination of two stories including both serious and amuse parts can make substantial impact on audience compared with monotonous one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...iceable impact on the human life. Being of of the most proliferated subject in all mo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'movies'' or 'movie's'?
Suggestion: movies'; movie's
.... Positively speaking, the goal of most movies maker is to address some moral things t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32917705736 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82052053683 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481296758105 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0993010583 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5625 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315703424811 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114508415652 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650729204995 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210636668095 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591812725845 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.