Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer.
Regarding the relation of the people cloth and their others' behavior, I am strongly inclined to take the side of this statement that there is a strong connection between them compared to other factors such as the people education, behavioral root, and the ethical characteristics of societies. Although, the cloth of people highly reflects their cultural principles, job position, and some psychological factors, in the special case, it is highly accepted that people are been behaved differently via wearing different cloths. In other words, the clothes is noticeably impact the people behavior who intend to establish the relation with. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, from discriminating viewpoint, people cloths highly likely depends on their social positions in the society. It is crystal clear that universities' professors should dress up and wear official clothes. As I cooperate with some academic institutes, I have rarely seen that the university's instructors wear fashion dresses. The way of their behavior influences their clothing. On the other hand, from integrating viewpoint, the others' behaviors to the people are corresponded to their positions. Simply put, the people behave with members of a society based on their class. For example, in the North Korea, on the whole, military mans are much more respectful than teacher contrasting Japan that teachers are most respectful members of the society. In other words, particularly in developing societies, there is causal relation between the social classification of a society on the one hand and the type and even the cost of the people clothes on the other hand. Referring to the old story of childhood that in the party the host behave differently with the man wear expensive and cheap clothes, it is obvious that main part of people put their attention to apparent of mans.
The importance of cloth is so crucial that unseasoned people have high tendency to attract the others' attention even by the brand of their clothes. This matter is so vital, that cloth producers utilize the celebrities to advertise their clothes. It goes without saying, the celebrities can be extremely recognized by wearing the clothes differently. They wear some type of clothes that is remarkably different from the other society's members. Although, in somehow, their clothes might be ridiculous, they do not take care about people's judgement. They want to be labeled and attracted the attention of people when it comes to different clothing. But what is most clear and I experienced several times, they do not behave differently with others. They only wear different clothes to be different from the main body of the society.
To recapitulate, considering the type of clothes that unquestionably related to the social position and the apparent judgement of typical people, I categorically put emphasis on the expression that the clothes is one of the critical factors that impact people behaviors. Nonetheless, In my opinion, people cloths significantly function as the surrounding changes. As the historical excavated findings reveal, the surrounding conditions effect the people cloths. For instance, in Africa, the people cloth is so brief that assist their life in the high warm ambient that in the opposite side, the people of Siberia wear thickened cloth to help heat them up. As a result, the behave of people to react differently with others cannot be contribute to the kind of their cloths. In contrast, the decoration of their cloth might effect the others to behave with them differently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 570, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'impacted'.
Suggestion: impacted
... other words, the clothes is noticeably impact the people behavior who intend to estab...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...eople have high tendency to attract the others attention even by the brand of their cl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 831, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent from the main body of the society. To recapitulate, considering the type of...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 670, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...loth to help heat them up. As a result, the behave of people to react differently with oth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 823, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...st, the decoration of their cloth might effect the others to behave with them differen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3062.0 1977.66487455 155% => OK
No of words: 581.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27022375215 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88291674126 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457831325301 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 936.0 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9178988295 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.407407407 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5185185185 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326997004264 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104972818781 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679193943109 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23031670123 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540530547021 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 86.8835125448 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.