Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?

Essay topics:

Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?

Smart phones are very important and necessary for every people. There are many advantages of using internet on smart phones like watching news, listening songs, playing games, learning new things. Many people believe that smart phone is dangerous for children. However, I believe that smart phones are important tool and it helps children learn new things.

Smart phones have many features that helps children in their learning. Using internet, they can learn new things, clear their doubt, learn other activities such as piano, guitar tutorials. With the use of e-mail facilities, they can mail to their faculties and clear their doubts and they gets updates about campus from university administration as well. For example, my friend Kuntal learn piano using smart phone and now he perform professionally in small concerts. He is passionate about piano and he find tutorials on youtube and learn things that helps him to earn money at very early age. So, smart phones provide better learning platforms.

In addition, smart phones also helps in emergency situation. Someitmes children fell ill in school and it is important to call parents or sometimes children needs to inform their parents about schedule change. If they have phones, then they can contact parents easily and it reduces worry of parents. Sometimes children's have extra lectures or sports practice after classes and it is easy to tell parents about that if they have phones. For example, I played football for my school team and I have sometimes extra practice and because I have phone so I call my father to inform them about practice. Thus, phones are useful in many situations.

However, there are some cases where children misuses smart phones and it may be dangerous for them. Sometimes children just play games and talk with their friends and it effects badly on their studies. Sometimes they addicted to games and their behavior becomes very unusual. They become more angry, rude or disturb and it is worst for any children. For example, games like blue whales or momo challenge takes life of children. There are many people addicted to games and they complete challenges and at last they commit suicide. So, parents should watch their children's activities on phones.

In conclusion, although there are some disadvantages of phone, but if parents monitor their children's phone activities, then it will be more advantageous of them. They learn many things and achieve many things in future.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...culties and clear their doubts and they gets updates about campus from university ad...
^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'performs'.
Suggestion: performs
...earn piano using smart phone and now he perform professionally in small concerts. He is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...ts. He is passionate about piano and he find tutorials on youtube and learn things t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...arn many things and achieve many things in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14640198511 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44564326798 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488833746898 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6519631125 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.96 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.12 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27932695727 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993377027689 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599009475424 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176522479928 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486581048971 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.