Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why
Invention of new technologies have been boom in some of the perspectives also curse in some of the aspects. In this modern world, the new sensation in this era is smart phones. Smart phone is a device which is extensively used in the present world irrespective of the age. Though this advent of new technology complemented ease of many works in the present scenario, but it is promoting some detrimental effects on young generation.
Primarily, smart phones have become one of the fundemental need in todays life. This need also encompasses the youth clan of the modern world. These set of individuals do need the technology to their futuristic benefits, but most of the time these young people are surpassing there limit to utilize technology and get distracted by indulging themselves in surfing unwanted things in it. This technology is fostering some of the advantages and also affecting substantially with disadvantages.
Futhermore, internet an ocean of contents which can help the mankind the way in which he/she assumed to be. As we know in internet there are hell lot of emulated contents that can affect the youth psychologically. Teenage is the age in which most of the unethical practices and activities are associated. In this age, mostly people are not aware of the future consequences of the practices in which they are indulging right now. For example, through this social media teens of this era are mostly inclined to the relationships, after entering to this aspect many forbidden activities like have fun with opposite gender may determinantly worser their mind.
Apart from social media activity, assume that an individual is perfectly utilising the given amenities and working hard to futher development. Even in this case this excessive use of this particular technology substantially affecting the physical health of young individuals.see for example, youth sits in front of computer for a long hours continiously without any breaks. These hectic work culture resulted in back pain, migrain and so on.
By the end, i personally disagree to the aspect of owing smartphones to young individuals by underlying the above context as the basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n of new technologies have been boom in some of the perspectives also curse in some of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... some of the perspectives also curse in some of the aspects. In this modern world, the new ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ngs in it. This technology is fostering some of the advantages and also affecting substanti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the way in which he/she assumed to be. As we know in internet there are hell lot ...
^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...th sits in front of computer for a long hours continiously without any breaks. These ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17378917379 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00853351892 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561253561254 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8327333886 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.823529412 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130829746317 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445096497104 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297417071909 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714143427518 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020365995439 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.