Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
Cell phones and the internet has become a vital part of everyone's lives. But, I do not agree that young children should be allowed to use cell phones and the internet in excess. There are several issues related to the same, though it has its own good reasons for using the cell phones and internet, there are an equal number of negativities too.
Firstly, a child in such a young age should explore the nature, go out and play, read books and do something creative, which enhances their imagination and creativity. Similarly, if the kids are allowed to use the gadgets and internet, as we can see it happening in the modern era, lesser kids tend to play outside, do something creative or imaginative. The imagination of the younger generation is stunt as they involve themselves in the sources that don't help imaginations grow. They don't question about anything, but are satisfied with what they find.
Secondly, Cell phone and the internet causes several health problems at a young age, as that is the age, when there is tremendous growth in the physical and mental development of a child, gadgets drags the development in a negative way. Children are confined to their homes, sitting idle in front of the cell phone, playing games on it, which only leads to strain and stress, both to brain and eyes obesity among the kids are so common now, for the same reason.
Thirdly, Socializing is an important factor of life, indulgence in cell phones and the internet, deteriorates the gregariousness. It's when one is young, the vital basic qualities have to be inculcated. But, voracious use of these gadgets, lead to the decline in the social etiquettes, that they become socially apprehensive, and thus leading to gauche. There are several kids who are facing such problems, which has to be taken seriously.
I do agree that Cell phones and the internet have it's own benefits, I even agree to the fact that, kids using such gadget tend to be way ahead in understanding technology than the ones who are not using them. But after a certain age, both the categories of kids fall in the same level. It’s only for a short period of time that the technology savvies persists. I would like to conclude stating that, young children should not be allowed to use technology in excess that it affects them and their future. As it is said, "Excess of anything is poison". I believe that Young children should go out and explore the world and question everything around, and live their lives, rather than sit in front of cell phones and ruin their health and nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... involve themselves in the sources that dont help imaginations grow. They dont quest...
^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... that dont help imaginations grow. They dont question about anything, but are satisf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...auses several health problems at a young age, as that is the age, when there is t...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... a child, gadgets drags the development in a negative way. Children are confined to their homes, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... same level. It's only for a short period of time that the technology savvies persists. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232876712329 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.180039138943 0.158761421928 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0724070450098 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0391389432485 0.046263068375 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0528375733855 0.0685040099705 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0978473581213 0.118717715034 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0391389432485 0.0351676179071 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61275555776 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0293542074364 0.0309702414327 95% => OK
Particles: 0.00195694716243 0.00188951952338 104% => OK
Determiners: 0.0841487279843 0.0887237588012 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0117416829746 0.0209618222197 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0176125244618 0.0139019557991 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2579.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 445.0 408.028673835 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79550561798 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314606741573 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229213483146 0.251872472559 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155056179775 0.174417080927 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103370786517 0.112833075102 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61275555776 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496629213483 0.524397521467 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 56.1241300332 59.2087087015 95% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.4210526316 20.5533526081 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3830881699 48.84282405 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.736842105 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4210526316 20.5533526081 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 46.3424009462 45.7405998639 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.35971223022 1.45489161554 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267415619011 0.300154397459 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102011394281 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0600479525106 0.0752933317313 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.533229887726 0.497263757937 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149616305142 0.151897553556 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12333321178 0.114077575197 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577999106464 0.0781384742642 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.417077978556 0.336927656856 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0564318697367 0.067059652881 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205935453046 0.210909579961 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290654105177 0.0618886996521 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.