Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by robots. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that in the future machines will take over all human jobs, as they help us to clean our apartments, solve bank problems or navigate in the city. But it is hard to imagine that someday they can do all available tasks. I will explore my point of view in the following essay.
On the one hand, full automation appears to be the most likely scenario for all process-driven jobs. Robots can be useful in the occupation that requires repetitive and predictable tasks. This means that they will help people to clear their schedule for more creative things. Indeed, industrial robots can be the best choice in this sphere, because they can perform monotonous jobs without fatigue and without lowering the level of accuracy. Moreover, they are able to work at the most dangerous places, like mines, where the job always contains a high risk for health.
On the other hand, I think that most human jobs require characteristics that we cannot find in robots, as they can't replicate such human qualities as empathy, creativity, and a sense of humor. That is why I believe that most people are safe from being replaced at their workplace. Recent studies have shown that robots can be creative, but they can't be truly innovative, because they are only able to imitate different things that humans have already put into them. As the software is preprogrammed a long time before the actual communication, it seems that natural human-like communication with robots is next to impossible. For example, If I was an old lady in the hospital, I would prefer a real person to be my caregiver, rather than some robots, which can give only the same standard answers to my questions.
To sum up, I tend to believe that robots can not fully replace humans in their jobs in the future. First of all, they are really good only in repetitive and predictable tasks. Secondly, they can not provide real human interaction, which is an important part of our life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... that we cannot find in robots, as they cant replicate such human qualities as empat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n that robots can be creative, but they cant be truly innovative, because they are o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can not provide real human interaction, which is an important part of our life. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81065088757 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61598697179 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2040080496 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200153805637 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705199707379 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403392530401 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132260792349 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340449691622 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.