It is better to spend money on traveling and vacations than to save money for some time in the future.
In the modern world spending money wisely is one of the most important skills. If you are an industrious and dynamic person, it will be easy for you to earn money. But in order to become a prosperous member of society, you should also know how to spend money properly. That's why I think that you should save money rather than waste them on traveling and vacations.
First of all, in the modern fast-changing world we never know what life has prepared for us. Most people can work remotely today. They don't have to buy an apartment, they can easily change their residence, and they keep only the most necessary things with them. They can be spontaneous and easily move around the world. But what if you suddenly get a serious disease? You can't continue your work, you don't have health insurance to cover your expenses, you don't have any support from your friends. I believe that in this case, it would be helpful to have some amount of money that you have previously saved.
Moreover, money can give you more freedom. If you saved some money on your bank account, you can be more independent in your life decisions. For example, you can easily resign from your job if you don't like it and spend some time alone with your thoughts and feelings. It's very important to follow your real passion in life, but it's also important to have a financial cushion. Popular opinion said that you should think about how much money you need each month and then save like two or three times more. After this, you can try to start a new life.
From what has been discussed, I can come to the conclusion that people would benefit more if they save their money wisely rather than spend it on traveling and vacations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... also know how to spend money properly. Thats why I think that you should save money ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...waste them on traveling and vacations. First of all, in the modern fast-changin...
^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st people can work remotely today. They dont have to buy an apartment, they can easi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...you suddenly get a serious disease? You cant continue your work, you dont have healt...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sease? You cant continue your work, you dont have health insurance to cover your exp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...h insurance to cover your expenses, you dont have any support from your friends. I b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... can easily resign from your job if you dont like it and spend some time alone with ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, for example, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57328990228 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22122133781 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534201954397 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1116666624 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225758441068 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853998950724 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789350919198 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180809759772 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888856681194 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.