Some people believe that students should attend field trips such as visiting zoos, museums or parks to learn knowledge. Others believe that students should stay in classrooms to learn knowledge. What is your opinion on this issue?
In this sophisticated world that we live in, there is a controversial argument among people who believes that the educations methods should be changed and who not. In my opinion, field trips help students to learn better. It remains to elaborate some benefits of this kind of education in detail.
First and foremost, children obtain more experience in this way. there are many researches demonstrating that students have an exponential rate of learning by experiencing their studies. For example, when teachers declare them some theories, they try to memorize these theories or formulas, but when they saw these theories in a laboratory, they learn them expeditiously. Hence, experiences play an inevitable role in students' learning.
Added to this, these kinds of places provide a communicating atmosphere. Gone to a scientific trip, students talk to each other or talk to their teacher. these negotiations help them to apprehend more information from their milieu. Furthermore, not only they make better relationships, but they also learn how to be a good team player in their community. having a short trip with their friends, students find their connections important.
having summarized all the points on good impacts of out class learning, I can draw a firm conclusion that these kinds of activities not only are beneficial for students but also are essential. Finally, there is an emphatic suggestion that teachers and headmasters provide more facilities for students to have some scientific trips or allot more budget for these kinds of activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ion, field trips help students to learn better. It remains to elaborate some benefits ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ren obtain more experience in this way. there are many researches demonstrating that ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...to each other or talk to their teacher. these negotiations help them to apprehend mor...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
... a good team player in their community. having a short trip with their friends, studen...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...ents find their connections important. having summarized all the points on good impac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, for example, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 247.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32793522267 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01106266715 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607287449393 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3304662248 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203435080495 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743659306567 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617924278439 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130304654492 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693885456528 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.