Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year. Others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons
Although some people think that teacher’s salary should depend on performance of students, I feel otherwise since this approach can lead to preparation to test instead of teaching students. This coupled with difficulties of estimating student’s knowledge.
To begin with, if we link income of teachers with knowledge of pupils, it can preclude teachers to do their job – teaching students. This may happen because teaching to subject does not grant the high results on a test and consequently high salary. Furthermore, Preparing to test becomes more profitable than ordinary educational process. The consequences of that can be huge. Quality of education may decrease since students will good on a test, yet will know nothing beyond the test. Since education is ground of society and development of it depend on people’s education. In other words, I think that only learned people can move country and society forward so initiatives that may worse the educational level in a state should be eliminated. Paying to teachers in relation with learning of students is one of such initiatives.
What is more, there is no exact way for estimation of student’s knowledge so we cannot estimate and compare how students from different school know discipline. I know about tests and exams as methods to evaluate pupil’s knowledge only. Both of them have disadvantages that prevent to use them in justify teacher’s salary distribution. First, any test or exam is not able to include all studied material. A tester will be examined for a part of course only so a student can get few questions that he learned and get a high score even if he barely knows a subject. For example, it happened to me, when I got an excellent score by luck only. My knowledge did not satisfy my mark. Second, any exam or test gives any opportunity to prepare for it and be able to answer any problem for a test. Nonetheless, It won’t show the knowledge if subject since students can rote memorize answers to particular questions and problems. This rote memorization may cost nothing in terms of learning.
To summarize, both our inability to estimate fairly how much a student has learned and transition to preparing to tests instead of teaching make me think that professors income should not depend on pupil’s performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'test'.
Suggestion: test
... learned and transition to preparing to tests instead of teaching make me think that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... instead of teaching make me think that professors income should not depend on pupil'...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, for example, i feel, i think, of course, in other words, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11749347258 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03008882394 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545691906005 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7353443288 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124220746943 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391201596793 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035586891736 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859396527483 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207947254068 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.