Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why?
With the development of society, there is a necessary issue people talking about that should people have ambitious dream and pursue them or focus on realistic goal and contrive to achieve them. Some individuals assert that people should pay attention to realistic aim because many of the realistic goals have to be cultivated to motive the one make a progress in a comparatively short time. However, in terms of me, I think people should have ambitious dreams and continue to pursuing them. Because long term goals are more likely to make a progress all the time.
Having an ambitious dreams will influence and promote people`s continuous progress, and the idea of people will be fully inspired. Because it is a long-term goal, people will not slack off and when such a goal is achieved, the impact will be enormous. There is no denying that long-term goal must take more time to complete, so people will work harder to achieve his goal. Set the radium as an example, long long ago, no body believe people who have cancer can still alive. But there is a women named Madame Curie have the ambitious dream that save people`s life which dead because of cancer. Then she begun to do experiment with much effort and finally, she discovered the appearance of the radium after several years ago. Until now, with the help of the radium, people are capable of treating cancer through the radium and the use of the radium saved many lives. Many scientists do not have such an ambitious dream because they do not have such a long-term goal.
Long-term goals are always requiring people to put more effort on them, which can provide a series of benefits to people whose goals are long-term, such as the spirit of perseverance of finishing their achievements, thought of never flinching at difficulties, and invincible confidence. All of this go a long way to help people being successful in their future. These lessons learned from achieving long-term goals are often more valuable than those learned from achieving short-term goals. Research shows that people who work their way up from the bottom to the top are more appreciated by bosses than those who stick with the same job because ambitious people know exactly what they want and keep working toward it until they get there.
This type of person is more motivated both in promotion and in the workplace than those with short-term goals. Of course the boss likes someone who can bring constant benefits to the company. While those with only short-term goals can't help but take a break to relax after reaching their goals, people with long-term goals won't allow themselves to do that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...to be cultivated to motive the one make a progress in a comparatively short time. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s dreams and continue to pursuing them. Because long term goals are more likely to make...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'dream'?
Suggestion: dream
...s all the time. Having an ambitious dreams will influence and promote people'...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: long
...his goal. Set the radium as an example, long long ago, no body believe people who have ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...he radium as an example, long long ago, no body believe people who have cancer can stil...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a women'?
Suggestion: there are a women
...le who have cancer can still alive. But there is a women named Madame Curie have the ambitious d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...ve cancer can still alive. But there is a women named Madame Curie have the ambitious d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
... cancer can still alive. But there is a women named Madame Curie have the ambitious d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'began'?
Suggestion: began
... which dead because of cancer. Then she begun to do experiment with much effort and f...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 231, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... While those with only short-term goals cant help but take a break to relax after re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, still, then, while, i think, of course, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87777777778 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49159079533 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502222222222 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7173814245 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.526315789 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6842105263 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345058186905 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124881746399 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11122309146 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223125929429 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125489770578 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.