21ST century is the era of technology and it is become indispensable for human beings to use technology almost in every field. People can easily share their ins and out with anyone. There are many social site: Facebook, U-tube, Twitter etc. Most people like to share their picture on social media while other feel it unsafe to reveal the personal information on social media. Personally, I believe to keep uploading information on social site is an incredible idea. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, The best way to keep the records of old memories is to save the data somewhere else you can restore it easily: Social media. The best part of it is you can restore it within a second. On the top of that restore it anywhere. My own experience is the evidence of this. two years ago I uploaded the pictures of my whole family celebrating Diwali festival on Facebook site. Recently my cousin came to meet us from abroad and started talk about Diwali celebration and asked to show pictures and video clip. Unfortunately, I reset my phone and all data erased from the phone then I get to know that I saved the pictures on Facebook and I restore all these images from there in a single tick. This experience made me think Social site is the best place to secure one's data perfactly.
Secondly, In the multitasking busy schedule usually we forgot to take carry important documents with us. Thanks to modern technology one's can get soft format of data. For instance Five years ago when I was studying in university and also searching for part-time job. but forgot to carry out documents and one of my friend suggested to get documents via G-mail by scanning them. I asked to my friend to go and get documents and mail to me from my hometown.
In conclusion, social site not only the perfect platform to store personal photographs and share memory easily but also printed version of important document anywhere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...echnology and it is become indispensable for human beings to use technology almos...
^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sites'?
Suggestion: sites
... out with anyone. There are many social site: Facebook, U-tube, Twitter etc. Most pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
...own experience is the evidence of this. two years ago I uploaded the pictures of my...
^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs ago when I was studying in university and also searching for part-time job. bu...
^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... and also searching for part-time job. but forgot to carry out documents and one o...
^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested getting'.
Suggestion: suggested getting
...arry out documents and one of my friend suggested to get documents via G-mail by scanning them. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uments and mail to me from my hometown. In conclusion, social site not only the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...version of important document anywhere.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68299711816 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55606112923 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547550432277 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.513162364 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182372809176 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528094769565 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618507932769 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098409481854 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880995288345 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.