Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurant. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurant. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Since the dawn of the humanity, eating proper food has always played crucial role in humans’ lifestyle. In this regard, the place where people eat their foods is important. Had people realized the significance and advantages of a proper place to cook and eat their foods, they would have deliberated on it much more meticulously. Nowadays, a majority of people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants, on the contrary to this popular view, there are those who subscribe to the idea that preparing and eating food at home is convenient. In my opinion, eating out significantly outweighs those of prefer to eat at home. The reasons why I incline to eating out are manifold, three of which-that is- primarily, the great atmosphere at restaurants, save time, and diversity of choices, are among the most conspicuous ones.

A subtle explanation to why I prefer to eat at restaurants, rests on the fact that restaurants and food stands have great atmosphere which everyone can benefited of it. In today’s hectic and chaotic life, feeling relax plays a great role. There are a quit a few people at restaurants who talk to each other, tell jokes and laugh, to name but a handful and such this place increases people’s appetite This is mainly because, one can feel better at crowed place when watching other people and this leads to help everyone to have great mood. Besides, putting the discussion in a further context, the second reasons why I agree with eating out is that there is no time for preparing for food and washing dishes after that. By this, a lot of time can be saved. Time, as we all know, is money. Eating out can save a lot of time rather than preparing foods at home. Last but not least, there are a lot of choices at restaurants rather than at home. People must buy a cookbook to prepare diversity of food, however, there are all kinds of restaurants such as Chinese restaurants, English restaurants, to name but a few. Also each of them have a different menu which everyone can choose one of them easily.

Having touched on the topic that aspect, I tend to discuss it from another perspective as well. Some people believe that eating out is dangerous. The foods which cook at restaurants are not healthy. The processes of preparing foods and the nutrients which used are not clear. With this in mind, eating out may causes to many illnesses such as digestive cancer. This may be true to some extent; however, the fact that there are a quite a few food stands that prepare their foods with fresh nutrients.

Considering the aforementioned arguments and discussions, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that is not rational to underestimate the advantages of restaurants. There are all kinds of food stands in every town and everyone can enjoy to eat at them rather than home.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...ave great atmosphere which everyone can benefited of it. In today's hectic and chaot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...English restaurants, to name but a few. Also each of them have a different menu whic...
^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoy eating'.
Suggestion: enjoy eating
...d stands in every town and everyone can enjoy to eat at them rather than home.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, second, so, well, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77868852459 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72492291965 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459016393443 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5038220229 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427604238391 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132302811423 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103186040534 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280611822965 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878401268601 0.0645574589148 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

has always played crucial role
has always played a crucial role
has always played crucial roles
has always played the crucial role

Sentence: In my opinion, eating out significantly outweighs those of prefer to eat at home.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to of and prefer

the great atmosphere at restaurants, save time, and diversity of choices,
the great atmosphere at restaurants, time saved, and diversity of choices, //need to be parallel

have great atmosphere
have a great atmosphere
have great atmospheres

Sentence: ... everyone can benefited of it.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to can and benefited

and the nutrients which used are not clear.
and the nutrients which are used are not clear.
and the nutrients used are not clear.

we may safely arrive at the conclusion that is not rational to underestimate
we may safely arrive at the conclusion that it is not rational to underestimate

can enjoy to eat at them rather than home.
can enjoy eating over there rather than home. //enjoy + ving

----------------------

flaws:
1.No. of Words: 488 while No. of Different Words: 219 //read more articles and learn how to use verbs:
http://www.testbig.com/reading_and_listening

2.No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2 //Read a good grammar book.

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 488 350
No. of Characters: 2245 1500
No. of Different Words: 219 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.7 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.6 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.566 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 142 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.003 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.458 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.445 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.122 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5