Some people prefer to go and visit a tourist attraction where there are many people. Others like the one with fewer people. Which one do you prefer?
The infestation of difficulties in human life sometimes makes him overwhelmed. Visiting tourist attractions is always the best solution for passing the condition. It helps them to release their stress and motivate themselves. But it has always been questioned which kind of places is the best choice for this purpose, clam places with a pristine nature without individuals or crowded ones which attract more visitors across the world? From my point of view, the sound of overcrowded places is much more interesting than the other. In the following paragraphs, the most outstanding reason for my point of view will be explained.
The first remarkable point to substantiate my standpoint is crowded tourist attractions provide people with great opportunities to make new friends and socialize with them. It also leads individuals to increase their pieces of information about that place. Each individual interacts with others, and this concept enumerates the great relationships. To bring into the more vivid picture, I should express my personal experience in this field. Five years ago, my husband and I decided to go somewhere to spend our honeymoon. He offered me an amazing trip to Italy. Although the sound of Visiting a European country was fabulous, I would rather prefer to spend our honeymoon where it has beautiful sceneries with virgin nature for being more memorable. On the other hand, when I saw my husband enthusiastic about the Italy trip, I respected to his eagerness. So, we went there. On the first day of our journey, we met a dozen couples that they were new too. They were friendly and charming people. So, my husband and I decided to hang out with them more and more. After that trip, our friendship has got stronger, and now, we are close friends. If we had not chosen this trip, we lost our opportunities in finding fantastic friends and having a marvelous honeymoon.
Another reason which is worthy of mentioning here is that the places which attract more tourists have better welfare amenities. Countries that have been more traveled have excellent services for travelers like comfortable hotels, great transportation systems, and amazing restaurants. In fact, the government of those countries invests in all these subordinates due to attract more visitors. Indeed, in order to inject the more revenue into the tourists’ industry, the better welfare amenities require. For example, on our honeymoon, all the hotels and restaurants located there were marvelous. There was all type of foods from all around the world to satisfy international visitors, and comfortable hotels with the luxury design were built by the government to attain tourists. Also, the public transportation system was awesome. Taxies brought people everywhere; however, tourists could travel all around the cities by bus or subway system at the cheapest cost. All of these facilities would not be available if there were not enough passengers.
Taking all the aforementioned into account, one can conclude that crowded tourist attractions not only provide great opportunities for finding new international friends but also help you to enjoy your trips by use of outstanding facilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25882352941 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88702835424 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8435071786 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.96666666667 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167145555653 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335424271293 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453499362754 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956827376016 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00661531881017 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.