Some people prefer to go and visit tourist attractions where there are many tourists; others like the ones with fewer people. Which one do you select?
Visiting tourist attractions is one of the most exciting experiences everyone can get. People depending on their personalities and opinions, choose different touristic places. Some people think they should avoid going to areas crowded with tourists. However, standing on the other side of the continuum, others believe it would be better to visit somewhere with many visitors. I, personally, concur with the first group for two main reasons that I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in a crowded place, the possibility of encountering some threatening factors such as criminals or even some viral diseases is higher than the places containing fewer people. When a large population gathers together in a crowded place, they probably lose their money, possessions, and even children to rubbers and criminals. Such criminals are waiting for an excellent opportunity to abuse others. To be more specific, in such a circumstance, people have less control over their belongings, and as a result, they will be hurt. Moreover, when people come from different countries and gather in a given place, they bring all viruses and harmful diseases. Take the Covid-19 as an example. In areas with many people, the prevalence rate was drastically more than in places with few populations.
Another equivalent reason is that people who visit a particular tourist place have a penchant for meeting all the aspects of the site and want to hear the explanation the tour leader offers. These would not be possible in association with many people. When there are many people around a tourist spot, it is not easy to enjoy spending time there and getting acquainted with the characteristics of such places because plenty of people are waiting to visit that where. Moreover, people are talking and making noise, which prevents those who want to listen to the tour leader's information. A personal example can drive this notion home. When my friends and I went to a crowded museum, we all wanted to know about the history of a kind of handy craft. Nonetheless, none of us could find the information because of the distraction that other tourists made.
In conclusion, considering the two mentioned reasons, I believe that people should attend tourist attractions with few people. In this way, not only do people stay protected from some hazardous factors such as criminals and viral diseases, but they also have a chance to get familiar with the place they visit without any disturbance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, even so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11519607843 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76943757068 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2366215124 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.380952381 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33432613906 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910463729513 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744320309519 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217543914365 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858962289674 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.