Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
It is time to step back and look at to our society. Look at the different levels that are appeared in the society and the huge gap between riches and poor. In such situation, directly proposing money to poor people should the easiest possible remedy to this complicated social diseases. But I believe there are some huge negative issues that will appear if we continue to offering money to the beggars who are asking for that.
Foremost, by giving financial resources to the beggars, we are preventing them to go out and look for a proper job. It is widely believed that they are not prone to work or mainly they are reluctant to be hired for a career. Many researchers rest on this believe that it is better to teach a person how to catch a fish, rather than giving him a fish.
As an example, if a begger finds out that he will recieve a certain amount of money by the end of the week, he will not look for a job; but rather if we offer him a general job (instead of money), he will be pushed towards a better future.
In addition, offering money to someone may relieve the financial problems for a short period. While it is crystal clear that in order to sustain financially there is a need for planning and gaining some skills. It should be an interesting approach to give stipend to the people who are in need of money in meanwhile ask them to pass some trainings. In fact such trainings, will improve their ability to better integrate with the society.
last but not the least, we need to wear the shoes of the homelesses and baggers to better understand their needs. Most of the time they need the money for having a meal or for drinking coffee. For these purposes we should consider to raise fund and distribute the food within local shelters. This should be a specimen of systematic approach to this social problem.
By contrast, we never can minimize the severity of a homeless life and their financial problems and there is a room for special consideration from the municipalities to prepare some facilities for them such as shelters.
All in all, I can`t say that I am disagree with the fact that it is better to prevent to give directly money to baggers. I believe that such complex social problems need to be studied in details to find an optimum solution for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the beggars who are asking for that. Foremost, by giving financial...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be pushed towards a better future. In addition, offering money to someone m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...better integrate with the society. last but not the least, we need to wear ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 14, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...ate with the society. last but not the least, we need to wear the ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 236, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider raising'.
Suggestion: consider raising
...ng coffee. For these purposes we should consider to raise fund and distribute the food within loc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c approach to this social problem. By contrast, we never can minimize the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilities for them such as shelters. All in all, I can't say that I am d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
... All in all, I can't say that I am disagree with the fact that it is better to prev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 54, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
... All in all, I can't say that I am disagree with the fact that it is better to prevent to give directl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, while, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56009615385 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49215554609 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4889739903 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8421052632 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163853969493 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540280258249 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493405003637 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844989803315 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366870503653 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.